Abstract:A/B testing, also referred to as online controlled experimentation or continuous experimentation, is a form of hypothesis testing where two variants of a piece of software are compared in the field from an end user’s point of view. A/B testing is widely used in practice to enable data-driven decision making for software development. While a few studies have explored different facets of research on A/B testing, no comprehensive study has been conducted on the state-of-the-art in A/B testing. Such a study is crucial to provide a systematic overview of the field of A/B testing driving future research forward. To address this gap and provide an overview of the state-of-the-art in A/B testing, this paper reports the results of a systematic literature review that analyzed primary studies. The research questions focused on the subject of A/B testing, how A/B tests are designed and executed, what roles stakeholders have in this process, and the open challenges in the area. Analysis of the extracted data shows that the main targets of A/B testing are algorithms, visual elements, and workflow and processes. Single classic A/B tests are the dominating type of tests, primarily based in hypothesis tests. Stakeholders have three main roles in the design of A/B tests: concept designer, experiment architect, and setup technician. The primary types of data collected during the execution of A/B tests are product/system data, user-centric data, and spatio-temporal data. The dominating use of the test results are feature selection, feature rollout, continued feature development, and subsequent A/B test design. Stakeholders have two main roles during A/B test execution: experiment coordinator and experiment assessor. The main reported open problems are related to the enhancement of proposed approaches and their usability. From our study we derived three interesting lines for future research: strengthen the adoption of statistical methods in A/B testing, improving the process of A/B testing, and enhancing the automation of A/B testing.

Unwitting Participants at Our Expense: A/B Testing and Digital Exploitation

Online Controlled Experiments for Personalised e-Commerce Strategies: Design, Challenges, and Pitfalls

How A/B testing changes the dynamics of information spreading on a social network

Best of Three Worlds: Adaptive Experimentation for Digital Marketing in Practice

A/B testing: A systematic literature review

Online Evaluation of Audiences for Targeted Advertising via Bandit Experiments

A/B Testing in Cross-Cultural Contexts: Investigating the Influence of Cultural Factors on A/B Test Results and Optimization Strategies for Global Audiences

Trustworthy Online Marketplace Experimentation with Budget-split Design

Statistical Challenges in Online Controlled Experiments: A Review of A/B Testing Methodology

Powerful A/B-Testing Metrics and Where to Find Them

A Common Misassumption in Online Experiments with Machine Learning Models

Using Adaptive Bandit Experiments to Increase and Investigate Engagement in Mental Health

An Opportunistic Bandit Approach for User Interface Experimentation

Trustworthy Experimentation Under Telemetry Loss

Understanding the user perception of digital nudging in platform interface design

End User Accounts of Dark Patterns as Felt Manipulation

Adaptive Experimentation with Delayed Binary Feedback

A Two-Part Machine Learning Approach to Characterizing Network Interference in A/B Testing

Measuring e-Commerce Metric Changes in Online Experiments

Meta-experiments: Improving experimentation through experimentation

An architecture for enabling A/B experiments in automotive embedded software