Abstract:Abstract Background Clinical practice guidelines have become increasingly widely used to guide quality improvement of clinical practice. Qualitative research may be a useful way to improve the quality and implementation of guidelines. The methodology for qualitative evidence used in guidelines development is worthy of further research. Methods A comprehensive search was made of WHO, NICE, SIGN, NGC, RNAO, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, CBM, and VIP from January 1, 2011 to February 25, 2020. Guidelines which met IOM criteria and were focused on clinical questions using qualitative research or qualitative evidence, were included. Four authors extracted significant information and entered this onto data extraction forms. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool was used to evaluate the guidelines’ quality. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 17.0 and R version 3.3.2. Results Sixty four guidelines were identified. The overall quality of the guidelines was high (almost over 60%). Domain 1 (Scope and Purpose) was ranked the highest with a median score of 83% (IQ 78–83). Domain 2 (Stakeholder involvement) and Domain 5 (Applicability) were ranked the lowest with median scores of 67% (IQ 67–78) and 67% (IQ 63–73) respectively. 20% guidelines used qualitative research to identify clinical questions. 86% guidelines used qualitative evidence to support recommendations (mainly based on primary studies, a few on qualitative evidence synthesis). 19% guidelines applied qualitative evidence when considering facilitators and barriers to recommendations’ implementation. 52% guideline developers evaluated the quality of the primary qualitative research study using the CASP tool or NICE checklist for qualitative studies. No guidelines evaluated the quality of qualitative evidence synthesis to formulate recommendations. 17% guidelines presented the level of qualitative research using the grade criteria of evidence and recommendation in different forms such as I, III, IV, very low. 28% guidelines described the grades of the recommendations supported by qualitative and quantitative evidence. No guidelines described the grade of recommendations only supported by qualitative evidence. Conclusions The majority of the included guidelines were high-quality. Qualitative evidence was mainly used to identify clinical questions, support recommendations, and consider facilitators and barriers to implementation of recommendations’. However, more attention needs to be paid to the methodology. For example, no experts proficient in qualitative research were involved in guideline development groups, no assessment of the quality of qualitative evidence synthesis was included and there was lack of details reported on the level of qualitative evidence or grade of recommendations.

Guideline Panel Social Dynamics Influence the Development of Clinical Practice Recommendations: a Mixed-Methods Systematic Review

Values and Preferences of Health Care Professionals, Policy-Makers, Patients and Family Members Regarding Recommendations of Adapted Physical Restraint Guidelines in Critical Care: A Survey Research

Decomposing clinical practice guidelines panels' deliberation into decision theoretical constructs

How Well Did the Consensus Methods Apply in the Guideline Development of Traditional Chinese Medicine: a Web-Based Survey in China

An Approach to Diversifying the Selection of a Guideline Panel—The Process Utilized for the Updated Adult Critical Care Ultrasound Guidelines

Discordant and inappropriate discordant recommendations in consensus and evidence based guidelines: empirical analysis

New methods facilitated the process of prioritizing questions and health outcomes in guideline development

Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery Clinical Practice Guideline Development Scheme: An Overview of Evidence Quality Assessment Methods, Evidence to Decision Frameworks, and Reporting Standards in Guideline Development

Methodology for clinical practice guidelines--members,groups or committee of guideline development

An exploration of how developers use qualitative evidence: content analysis and critical appraisal of guidelines

Analysis of Development Method of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Primary Care

An International Needs Assessment Survey of Guideline Developers Demonstrates Variability in Resources and Challenges to Collaboration between Organizations

CME CLINICAL COMMENTARY REVIEW: Patient Centered Practice Guidelines: GRADEing Evidence to Incorporate Certainty, Balance Between Benefits and Harms, Equity, Feasibility, and Cost-Effectiveness

Methodological proposals for developing trustworthy recommendations of integrative Chinese-Western medicine

Improving the Applicability and Feasibility of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Primary Care: Recommendations for Guideline Development and Implementation

Barriers and Enablers for the Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines in China: a Mixed-Method Study.

[Development of Clinical Practice Guidelines: Procedure and Standard].

How equity is addressed in clinical practice guidelines: a content analysis.

Protocol for the development of guidance for stakeholder engagement in health and healthcare guideline development and implementation

Cognitive psychological studies of representation and use of clinical practice guidelines

The Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines in China: a Systematic Assessment.