Should Internal Mammary Lymph Node Sentinel Biopsy Be Performed in Breast Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Jing Gong,Yongfu Yu,Gaosong Wu,Lin Cai,Xin Tu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1683-8
2019-01-01
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Abstract:Results from studies of internal mammary lymph node sentinel biopsy are inconsistent.A comprehensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane database, and Clinical Trials. Studies reporting the rate of internal mammary lymph node sentinel biopsy (IMN-SLNB) positivity were identified. We performed pooled proportion meta-analysis using random-effects meta-analyses. The correlation of IMN and axillary lymph node (AXN) metastasis was also investigated.After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 18 articles (total number of patients = 2427) were included. The pooled estimate for IMN-SLNB positivity rate was 15% (95% confidence interval (CI) 12-17%). Significant between-study heterogeneity was observed. Our results indicate that axillary lymph node metastasis is a strong predictor of IMN involvement (OR 6.01, 95% CI, 3.49, 10.34).Internal mammary lymph nodes metastasis might be underestimated. Patients with positive axillary lymph nodes have a higher risk of internal lymph nodes metastasis. As a result, IMN-SLNB might be considered in these patients. Future work needs to be done to assess whether pathological confirmed IMN metastasis can affect patients' survival.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?