Abstract:In both statistical genetics and phylogenetics, a major goal is to identify correlations between genetic loci or other aspects of the phenotype or environment and a focal trait. In these two fields, there are sophisticated but disparate statistical traditions aimed at these tasks. The disconnect between their respective approaches is becoming untenable as questions in medicine, conservation biology, and evolutionary biology increasingly rely on integrating data from within and among species, and once-clear conceptual divisions are becoming increasingly blurred. To help bridge this divide, we derive a general model describing the covariance between the genetic contributions to the quantitative phenotypes of different individuals. Taking this approach shows that standard models in both statistical genetics (e.g., Genome-Wide Association Studies; GWAS) and phylogenetic comparative biology (e.g., phylogenetic regression) can be interpreted as special cases of this more general quantitative-genetic model. The fact that these models share the same core architecture means that we can build a unified understanding of the strengths and limitations of different methods for controlling for genetic structure when testing for associations. We develop intuition for why and when spurious correlations may occur using analytical theory and conduct population-genetic and phylogenetic simulations of quantitative traits. The structural similarity of problems in statistical genetics and phylogenetics enables us to take methodological advances from one field and apply them in the other. We demonstrate this by showing how a standard GWAS technique—including both the genetic relatedness matrix (GRM) as well as its leading eigenvectors, corresponding to the principal components of the genotype matrix, in a regression model—can mitigate spurious correlations in phylogenetic analyses. As a case study of this, we re-examine an analysis testing for co-evolution of expression levels between genes across a fungal phylogeny, and show that including covariance matrix eigenvectors as covariates decreases the false positive rate while simultaneously increasing the true positive rate. More generally, this work provides a foundation for more integrative approaches for understanding the genetic architecture of phenotypes and how evolutionary processes shape it.

Network Approaches for Plant Phylogenomic Synteny Analysis

Toward microRNA-mediated gene regulatory networks in plants.

An Integrative Bioinformatics Framework for Genome-scale Multiple Level Network Reconstruction of Rice

Plantnatsdb: A Comprehensive Database Of Plant Natural Antisense Transcripts

Computational Network Biology: Data, Models, and Applications

Whole-genome microsynteny-based phylogeny of angiosperms

The promise and pitfalls of synteny in phylogenomics

Application of orthology and network biology to infer gene functions in non‐model plants

Computational inference of gene regulatory networks: Approaches, limitations and opportunities

Phylogenetic analysis of gene expression

Network Methods for Pathway Analysis of Genomic Data

Plant multiscale networks: charting plant connectivity by multi-level analysis and imaging techniques

PhyloGenes: An online phylogenetics and functional genomics resource for plant gene function inference

Modeling cellular machinery through biological network comparison

Pan- and core- network analysis of co-expression genes in a model plant

Gene Regulatory Network Inference: Connecting Plant Biology and Mathematical Modeling

Plant Pan-genomics: Opportunities, Advances, and Challenges

Prioritizing Maize Metabolic Gene Regulators through Multi-Omic Network Integration

Maize network analysis revealed gene modules involved in development, nutrients utilization, metabolism, and stress response

CoNekT: an open-source framework for comparative genomic and transcriptomic network analyses

Unifying approaches from statistical genetics and phylogenetics for mapping phenotypes in structured populations