P2‐025: Genetic and Epigenetic Influences on Brain Gene Expression in Psp

Mariet Allen,Xue Wang,Curtis Younkin,Jeremy D. Burgess,Travis Ballard,Daniel Serie,Chen Wang,Zhifu Sun,Saurabh Baheti,Minerva M. Carrasquillo,Thuy Nguyen,Kimberly G. Malphrus,Sarah Lincoln,Fanggeng Zou,Hongmei Chai,Gerard D. Schellenberg,Steven G. Younkin,Julia E. Crook,Tamás Ördög,Yan W. Asmann,Dennis W. Dickson,Nilüfer Taner
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2015.06.561
2015-01-01
Abstract:Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is a rare movement disorder; abnormally phosphorylated tau is the primary pathological lesion. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) identified 3 significant PSP risk loci in addition to the established H1 risk haplotype at the MAPT locus. We and others have shown that some of the SNPs implicated by PSP GWAS also associate with altered expression of proximal genes (in-cis) implicating transcriptional alterations as a possible disease mechanism. Gene expression can be influenced by both genetic and epigenetic factors; identifying and understanding the role of transcriptional control in the brains of PSP subjects may identify novel genes and indicate mechanism of action for future therapeutic targeting. We have previously collected gene expression profiles from 107 temporal cortex and 98 cerebellum PSP samples using the Illumina Whole-Genome DASL assay (WG-DASL) and 85 overlapping temporal cortex samples using RNAseq. DNA methylation (RRBS) was also investigated in 46 of the same temporal cortex samples. We are pursuing findings from these previous studies in an additional cohort of 192 temporal cortex PSP samples. RNA was isolated from brain tissue using the Ambion RNAqueous kit. Gene expression was studied in 192 temporal cortex PSP samples using WG-DASL; all gene expression measures underwent appropriate data QC. All samples have existing GWAS genotypes (Hoglinger et al, 2011). eQTL analysis was implemented in PLINK using linear regression, additive model, including appropriate covariates. One sample failed quality control. In the remaining 191 PSP samples, 25,809 of the 29,377 probes (18,516 genes) showed signal above background levels (detection p<0.05) in greater than 50% of the subjects. eQTL analysis of SNPs previously implicated by PSP GWAS and our eQTL studies (Zou et al, 2012) replicated our previous findings in the same direction as we had previously reported: rs11568653-SLCO1A2: beta= -0.89, p= 6.32E-13 and rs1768208 - MOBP: beta= 0.37, p= 2.85E-03. Genome-wide eQTL analysis is currently underway. Here we confirmed association of the PSP protective alleles for two PSP GWAS SNPs with decreased SLCO1A2 and increased MOBP levels. Genome-wide eQTL analysis may reveal additional PSP candidate genes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?