A Phase (ph) II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of the Cmet Inhibitor Capmatinib (INC280) in Patients (pts) with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC).

Tawesak Tanwandee,Wattana Sukeepaisarnjaroen,Stephen L. Chan,Su Pin Choo,Guohong Han,Virote Sriuranpong,Hongming Pan,Thomas Cheung Yau,Zhenggang Ren,Jianming Xu,Bin Peng,Takami Saji,Yunliang Sun,Alan Huang,Luigi Manenti,Shukui Qin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.4074
IF: 45.3
2016-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:4074 Background: Overexpression/activation of cMET occurs in 20‒48% of HCC, and predicts worse survival. Capmatinib (INC280) is a potent, selective cMET inhibitor that causes regression of cMET dysregulated (cMET+) animal solid tumor models at well-tolerated doses. This open-label, single-arm study is evaluating the safety and efficacy of INC280 in pts with cMET+ advanced HCC, who have received no prior systemic therapy (NCT01737827). Methods: The primary endpoint is time to progression (TTP); secondary endpoints are ORR, DCR, PFS, OS, safety and tolerability, and PK. Eligible pts were aged ≥ 18 years, ECOG PS ≤ 2, Child-Pugh A, and had no prior cMET/HGF-targeted therapy. Based on responding pts in preliminary studies, an eligibility criterion was amended to specify that tumors must have high cMET status (IHC 3+, IHC 2+ and cMET gene copy number [GCN] ≥ 5 by FISH, or cMET GCN ≥ 5 and unknown IHC); low cMET status is defined as IHC 2+ and GCN < 5, IHC 1+ and any GCN, or cMET GCN ≥ 5 and IHC 0+. Results: As of September 28, 2015, 36 pts were enrolled: 8 pts in a dose-determining part (INC280 300 mg BID) and 28 pts in Ph II dose-expansion groups (INC280 600 mg BID [capsules], except for one pt who received the wrong dose of 300 mg BID). In expansion pts (8 with high cMET and 20 with low cMET status; 89% male, 57% ECOG PS 0, 57% with distant metastases) median age was 55.5 years (range 34–74). Treatment was discontinued in 24/28 (86%) pts, mainly due to disease progression (54%); treatment is ongoing in 4 (14%) pts. The most common AEs, regardless of causality, were increased AST (39%), nausea (36%), diarrhea (32%), and vomiting (32%). The most common Grade 3/4 AEs, regardless of causality, were increased AST (29%), and hyperbilirubinemia (11%). INC280 PK was similar to that seen in non-HCC pts. Partial responses (PRs) were seen in 3/28 pts (ORR 11%). All responders had high cMET status; there were 3/8 PRs and 1/8 pts had stable disease in the high cMET group (ORR 38%; DCR 50%). Conclusions: Oral INC280 600 mg BID was well tolerated with a manageable safety profile, and showed activity in pts with high cMET status HCC. Confirmation of these initial positive results is warranted to establish the relevance of INC280 in HCC. Clinical trial information: NCT01737827.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?