Platelet Indices in the Prognostication of Critically Ill Patients: Another Piece of the Puzzle

Zhongheng Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.11.018
IF: 4.298
2015-01-01
Journal of Critical Care
Abstract:I would like to thank Dr Bayir and colleagues for their thoughtful insights into our previous work [1]. In their comments, they pointed out that the standardization of platelet indices measurement was the major obstacle inpreventingwide clinical application forillnessseverity evaluation, follow-up, and outcome prediction in critically ill patients [2]. It is true that, in our study, these standardized procedures such as type and amount of anticoagulant in the blood collection tube, environment of blood taking, and duration between blood taking and examination were not considered. Instead, platelet indices were measured in blood routines byusingautomated analyzer. In other words, platelet indices were by-products of the whole blood routines, together with the white blood cells, erythrocytes, and neutrophils. This is the real-world setting as being performed in our daily clinical practice. However, the time interval between blood taking and measurement is very short in our institution because we have specialized medical personnel to send blood samples immediately after blood taking. Although this factor cannot be incorporated into our analysis (the time interval was not recorded in the electronic medical record system), I could be sure it was within
What problem does this paper attempt to address?