Unraveling the Mechanisms Involved in Endothelial Barrier Protective Effects of Angiopoietin-1 Variant MAT.Ang-1

Ru‐Yuan Zhang,Min Dong,Jun Wu,Lei Li,Hongping Qu,Yao-Qing Tang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11844
IF: 15.1
2012-01-01
Critical Care
Abstract:With great interest we read the recent article by Alfi eri and colleagues [1], demonstrating that angiopoietin (Ang)-1 variant MAT.Ang-1 improved endotoxemiainduced microvascular dysfunction and microvascular hyperpermeability. Th e authors suggested that MAT. Ang-1-induced recovery of microcirculatory tissue perfusion during sepsis is due to preservation of endothelial barrier integrity. To further elucidate the mechanism, they investigated the possibility of involve ment of VE-cadherin, a major adherens junctions protein responsible for microvascular leakage in infl am mation. Th ey found, however, while there was no change in overall expression of VE-cadherin, MAT.Ang-1 increased VEcadherin phosphorylation in the treated mice, which appears unable to explain the observed endothelial barrier protective eff ects of MAT.Ang-1. Th e work by Dejana and co-workers [2] highlights the critical role of VE-cadherin for maintenance of endothelial barrier function. It is generally accepted that the tyrosine phosphorylation of VE-cadherin and other components of adherens junctions induced by permeabilityincreasing agents is associated with weak junctions and impaired barrier function via regulating VE-cadherin member localization [2]. Recently, among the nine tyrosines in the cytoplasmic tail of VE-cadherin, Potter and colleagues [3] revealed that tyrosine phosphorylation of VE-cadherin at two critical tyrosines, Tyr-658 and Tyr-731, was suffi cient to disrupt VE-cadherin-mediated cell-cell junctions, leading to inhibition of cell barrier function. Previous studies have shown that Ang-1 restores the endothelial barrier function via phosphorylation-dependent redistribution of VE-cadherin [4,5]. While in the present study the total amount of VE-cadherin was not changed, intriguingly MAT.Ang-1 increases VE-cadherin phosphorylation (at Y658) in sepsis. Th is is unexpected because the endothelial barrier protective eff ects of MAT. Ang-1 do not seem to be consistent with its eff ect on an important cellular junction molecule involved in endothelial cell integrity, namely VE-cadherin; however, other mecha nisms of action cannot be ruled out. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to investigate the mechanisms by which this novel Ang-1 variant rescues the endothelial barrier function.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?