Abstract:Abstract Background Performing basic hematology analysis in a near-patient setting enables more rapid clinical decision making in the process of diagnosis. Traditional blood analyzers in central labs use a complex combination of sensing principles and chemical modification of the sample to derive the necessary parameters for a complete blood count (CBC). To reduce cost and maintenance, varying approaches have been employed to determine a CBC with a single-step measurement technique. One common option is the use of optical microscopy to deliver highly reliable results, examples are fluorescence microscopy, digital holographic microscopy, or spatial light interference microscopy. However, most of these technologies lack a proper determination of cellular-level RBC parameters. Therefore, a non-interferometric, quantitative-phase measurement technique was developed to derive relevant CBC parameters from a single measurement, comparable to a standard lab analyzer. Methods The optical setup employed by this method enables the parallel acquisition of brightfield and differential interference contrast (DIC) images by polarization-sensitive cameras. By using three cameras with individual optical filters, quantitative phase and absorption information can be calculated, which enables the determination of mean cellular volume (MCV), mean cellular hemoglobin (MCH), and mean cellular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) for red blood cells (RBCs). The whole-blood sample is diluted in a buffer containing a non-cell-penetrating dye to enhance optical refraction contrast and therefore precision in the dependent calculated quantities. The sample is then introduced to a glass flow cell, and the cells are allowed to sediment to the bottom for imaging. Machine learning is applied to the derived images to classify unstained native white blood cells (WBCs) to yield a 5-part differential, which distinguishes between neutrophil, monocyte, lymphocyte, eosinophil and basophil. The algorithm is trained by imaging FACS-validated, purified WBC subgroups. All blood samples are measured on an ADVIA® 2120 Hematology System for control. Results A one-step, optical CBC hematology system based on quantitative phase and absorption image analysis was developed. The correlations for MCV and MCHC compared to a standard lab CBC analyzer were 0.77 and 0.84. The accuracy for the 5-part differential WBC classification was approximately 0.8. To enable a visual inspection of the classification results, a pseudo-colored image of each cell was generated and uploaded in a review tool. Conclusion With a more-refined, less-expensive optical setup, a high-quality CBC analyzer suitable for use at the point of care can be derived with the presented method. A possible simplification could be the use of low-cost but high-resolution Fourier ptychography microscopy (FPM) technology. Imaging of blood samples on a single-cell level offers the potential for the analysis of even more morphological parameters, for example, disease-related changes in the cell membrane. Also, the adhesion behavior of the WBCs in the glass flow cell could indicate cell activation status and therefore give information about infection processes. *Trademark disclaimer: “ADVIA, and all associated marks are trademarks of Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.”

Polarization Imaging and Classification of Jurkat T and Ramos B Cells Using a Flow Cytometer

Polarization Imaging and Classification of Jurkat T and Ramos B Cells Using a Flow Cytometer (vol 85A, pg 817, 2014)

Study of Cell Classification with a Diffraction Imaging Flow Cytometer Method

Meeting the Challenges of High-Dimensional Single-Cell Data Analysis in Immunology

Cancer‐Specific Therapy by Artificial Modulation of Intracellular Calcium Concentration

Validation of CyTOF Against Flow Cytometry for Immunological Studies and Monitoring of Human Cancer Clinical Trials

Development of microfluidic flow cytometry capable of characterization of single-cell intrinsic structural and electrical parameters

Development of Microfluidic Impedance Flow Cytometry Enabling the Quantification of Intrinsic Single-Cell Bio-Dielectric Parameters Based on Constrictional Microchannel, Numerical Simulation, and Neural Network

Publisher Correction: Global characterization of T cells in non-small-cell lung cancer by single-cell sequencing

Biological Variations of Peripheral Blood Lymphocytesusing Flow Cytometric Double-Platform Method

Pattern Recognition and Classification of Two Cancer Cell Lines by Diffraction Imaging at Multiple Pixel Distances

Corrigendum: Interpreting flow cytometry with caution: a case report of follicular lymphoma in leukemic phase misdiagnosed as chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Microfluidic Quantitative Flow Cytometer with Light Modulation

Classification of Human White Blood Cells Using Machine Learning for Stain-Free Imaging Flow Cytometry

Multi-angle pulse shape detection of scattered light in flow cytometry for label-free cell cycle classification

Flow Cytometric and Image Analyses of Colorectal Adenocarcinomas: A Comparative Study with Clinical Correlations

A-144 Three-wavelength Polarization Imaging Method for the Analysis of Individual Human Blood Cells With Dye-Enhanced Dispersion of Dilution Buffer

Advancing Diagnostic Accuracy and Quality of Patient Care Through the Implementation of a Flow Cytometry Quality Assurance Program

Automated EuroFlow approach for standardized in-depth dissection of human circulating B-cells and plasma cells

Correction to Study of RNA Polymerase II Clustering Inside Live-Cell Nuclei Using Bayesian Nanoscopy.

Using adjusted local assortativity with Molecular Pixelation unveils colocalization of membrane proteins with immunological significance