Abstract:Objective: To explore the effects of combined catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) on hemodynamics and quality of life in a subgroup of patients with lower limb deep vein thrombosis carel by using a case-control study. Methods: Eighty-four patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT: acute DVT and chronic DVT) of lower extremities treated in our hospital from April 2017 to June 2021 were randomly assigned into the control group (n = 42) and the research group (n = 42). The control group only received routine nursing combined with CDT; the research group was treated with cluster nursing l combined with CDT. The clinical efficacy, the difference in limb circumference, hemorheology, hemodynamics, coagulation index and life quality before and after treatment, and the nursing satisfaction scores were calculated. The effects of cluster nursing l combined with CDT on hemodynamics and life quality in patients with DVT of lower extremities were analyzed. Results: The clinical curative effect of the research group was better than that of the control group (P < 0.05). After intervention, the difference in the thigh and leg perimeter in the research group was reduced, and the difference in the thigh and leg perimeter in the research group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). After intervention, the whole blood low shear viscosity, plasma viscosity, platelet aggregation rate, and fibrinogen in the research group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). After intervention, segmental venous volume (SVC), maximum venous blood flow (MVO), and SVC/MVO in the research group were significantly higher than those before intervention, VRT was significantly prolonged, and MVO and venous pressure recovery time (VRT) were significantly higher than those in the control group. After intervention, D-dimer and fibrinogen decreased, prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time increased in the research group, and the improvement of blood coagulation index in the research group was significantly better than that in the control group (P < 0.05). After intervention, the scores of quality of life in the research group decreased, and the scores of physiological function, psychological function, social function, and health self-cognition in the research group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The satisfaction of patients in the research group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The application of cluster nursing l combined with CDT can effectively prevent lower limb venous thrombosis after operation and can enhance patients' hemorheology, hemodynamics, and blood coagulation function and significantly promote their life quality, nursing satisfaction is high, and it is worth popularizing and applying in clinic.

Long-term Prognostic Analysis of Early Interventional Therapy for Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis

Intra-arterial Contimuous Thrombolytic Therapy for Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis

Clinical experience of thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis

Interventional Thrombolysis Combined with Implantation of Inferior Vena Cava Filter in Treating Deep Venous Thrombosis of Lower Extremities

Application evaluation of different approaches for catheter-directed thrombolysis in acute lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis

Thrombectomy monitoring by DSA combined with thrombolytic therapy for deep venous thrombosis of lower extremities

Early and Midterm Outcomes of Acute Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis Treated by Catheter Directed Thrombolysis

Long-term result of thrombectomy and thrombolysis for acute mixed deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity

Outcome Comparisons of Anticoagulation, Systematic Thrombolysis and Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in the Treatment of Lower Extremity Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis

Intraluminal Venous Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Lower Limb Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis

Catheter Directed Thrombolysis for Treatment of Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis of the Lower Extremity of the Effect and Safety Analysis in 116 Cases

Analysis of Efficacy of Therapy in 165 Cases of Deep Vein Thrombosis of Lower Extremity

Endovascular management of proximal lower limb deep venous thrombosis – A prospective study with six-month follow-up

[Comparison of Surgical Thrombectomy and Interventional Thrombectomy for Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis of the Lower Extremity].

Efficacy of percutaneous mechanical thrombus removal in acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis

The short-term outcome of residual thrombus of the lower extremity after pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis

Mid-term Outcome of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis.

The Relationship between Efficacy of Thrombectomy and the Course of Deep Vein Thrombosis of the Lower Extremity

The Effect of Anticoagulant Thrombolytic Therapy on Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis Prognosis

Effects of CDT on Hemodynamics and Quality of Life in a Subgroup of Patients with Lower Limb Deep Vein Thrombosis Carel: A Case-Control Study

Intervention and surgical Therapy of Acute Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis