The last word: Rewriting musical theatre history with Sondheim
Geoffrey Block
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/smt.13.2.133_1
2019-06-01
Studies in Musical Theatre
Abstract:Decades before he emerged as Broadway’s éminence grise, Sondheim, who is ‘nothing if not critical’, offered penetrating but occasionally self-serving self-criticism of his own work, in particular the West Side Story lyrics. With the publication of Finishing the Hat in 2010, the first volume of his collected lyrics, Sondheim has refined and consolidated his unsystematic criticisms directed against many of his illustrious predecessors into a formidable collection of diatribes from which few reputations, with the exception of Sondheim’s, come away unscathed. In the Hammerstein sidebar of Finishing the Hat, readers learn details that support what Sondheim meant when he famously remarked in a 1973 Newsweek article that his mentor and de facto father was a lyricist of ‘limited talent’, partly offset by an ‘infinite soul’. In a manner not unlike Igor Stravinsky’s largely successful effort to deprive his teacher Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov of influence and stature, Sondheim has buried his spiritual father under a ‘bright canary yellow’ sky. For 50 years, he has also rarely lost an opportunity to demonize his grumpy metaphoric Uncle Dick (Richard Rodgers) as ‘a man of infinite talent – and limited soul’. After begrudgingly agreeing to write the lyrics to Rodgers’s music on Do I Hear a Waltz? (1965), Sondheim’s unwavering negative assessment of this show’s artistic merits, as well as the dispiriting collaborative experience of creating it, has succeeded, despite growing dissent, in seriously damaging the critical reputation of this worthy, if imperfect, musical. Clearly Rodgers, the composer of Carousel, the only musical Sondheim granted a place on the same playing field as Porgy and Bess, remained a source of creative anxiety for Sondheim. The article will argue that Sondheim’s personal and artistic animosity has not only led to a potential misrepresentation of Rodgers’s indispensable contributions to the field but to a rewriting of Broadway reception history that bears closer examination and challenge.