Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

Privacy by Memory Design: Visions and Open Problems

Two Birds with One Stone: Differential Privacy by Low-power SRAM Memory

NetDP: In-Network Differential Privacy for Large-Scale Data Processing

PhD Forum: Efficient Privacy-Preserving Processing via Memory-Centric Computing

Elephants Do Not Forget: Differential Privacy with State Continuity for Privacy Budget

A Framework for Differential Privacy Against Timing Attacks

Comprehensive Study of Security and Privacy of Emerging Non-Volatile Memories

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

"Ghost of the past": identifying and resolving privacy leakage from LLM's memory through proactive user interaction

Bridging Quantum Computing and Differential Privacy: Insights into Quantum Computing Privacy

Are We There Yet? Timing and Floating-Point Attacks on Differential Privacy Systems

Privacy Preserving In-memory Computing Engine

Privacy accounting $\varepsilon$conomics: Improving differential privacy composition via a posteriori bounds

Budget Recycling Differential Privacy

Memristor-Based Variation-Enabled Differentially Private Learning Systems for Edge Computing in IoT

Architecting Non-Volatile Main Memory to Guard Against Persistence-based Attacks

Memristor-Based Neuromorphic Hardware Improvement for Privacy-Preserving ANN

Differential Privacy in Privacy-Preserving Big Data and Learning: Challenge and Opportunity

Differential Privacy for Class-based Data: A Practical Gaussian Mechanism

Wasserstein Differential Privacy