Abstract:Effective human-robot teaming (HRT) increasingly requires humans to work with intelligent, autonomous machines. However, novel features of intelligent autonomous systems such as social agency and incomprehensibility may influence the human's trust in the machine. The human operator's mental model for machine functioning is critical for trust. People may consider an intelligent machine partner as either an advanced tool or as a human-like teammate. This article reports a study that explored the role of individual differences in the mental model in a simulated environment. Multiple dispositional factors that may influence the dominant mental model were assessed. These included the Robot Threat Assessment (RoTA), which measures the person's propensity to apply tool and teammate models in security contexts. Participants (N = 118) were paired with an intelligent robot tasked with making threat assessments in an urban setting. A transparency manipulation was used to influence the dominant mental model. For half of the participants, threat assessment was described as physics-based (e.g., weapons sensed by sensors); the remainder received transparency information that described psychological cues (e.g., facial expression). We expected that the physics-based transparency messages would guide the participant toward treating the robot as an advanced machine (advanced tool mental model activation), while psychological messaging would encourage perceptions of the robot as acting like a human partner (teammate mental model). We also manipulated situational danger cues present in the simulated environment. Participants rated their trust in the robot's decision as well as threat and anxiety, for each of 24 urban scenes. They also completed the RoTA and additional individual-difference measures. Findings showed that trust assessments reflected the degree of congruence between the robot's decision and situational danger cues, consistent with participants acting as Bayesian decision makers. Several scales, including the RoTA, were more predictive of trust when the robot was making psychology-based decisions, implying that trust reflected individual differences in the mental model of the robot as a teammate. These findings suggest scope for designing training that uncovers and mitigates the individual's biases toward intelligent machines.

Trust-Aware Human–Robot Fusion Decision-Making for Emergency Indoor Patrolling

Trust-Aware Decision Making for Human-Robot Collaboration: Model Learning and Planning

Trust-Preserved Human-Robot Shared Autonomy enabled by Bayesian Relational Event Modeling

Synthesized Trust Learning from Limited Human Feedback for Human-Load-Reduced Multi-Robot Deployments

Trust-Aware Assistance Seeking in Human-Supervised Autonomy

Toward Mutual Trust Modeling in Human-Robot Collaboration

Risk-Aware Decision Making for Human–Robot Collaboration With Effective Communication

Modeling and Predicting Trust Dynamics in Human-Robot Teaming: A Bayesian Inference Approach

Relevance-driven Decision Making for Safer and More Efficient Human Robot Collaboration

Trust as Extended Control: Active Inference and User Feedback During Human-Robot Collaboration

Trust in the Danger Zone: Individual Differences in Confidence in Robot Threat Assessments

A Human-Robot Dynamic Fusion Safety Algorithm for Collaborative Operations of Cobots

Trust in Shared-Space Collaborative Robots: Shedding Light on the Human Brain

Trust Repairing for Human-Swarm Cooperation inDynamic Task Response

Risk-Aware Decision Making for HumanCRobot Collaboration With Effective Communication

Trust as Extended Control: Human-Machine Interactions as Active Inference

A task level fusion autonomous switching mechanism

Swift Trust in Mobile Ad Hoc Human-Robot Teams

Trust-Aware Motion Planning for Human-Robot Collaboration under Distribution Temporal Logic Specifications

Multi-Task Trust Transfer for Human-Robot Interaction

Safety Assurances for Human-Robot Interaction via Confidence-aware Game-theoretic Human Models