Face-centered-cubicK3B80andMg3B80…

Qing‐Bo Yan,Qing‐Rong Zheng,Gang Su

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.80.104111

IF: 3.7

2009-01-01

Physical Review B

Abstract:By means of first-principles calculations within the density-functional theory, we find that stable face-centered-cubic (fcc) ${\text{K}}_{3}{\text{B}}_{80}$ and ${\text{Mg}}_{3}{\text{B}}_{80}$ solids can be formed. For both solids, two possibly stable geometrical phases (identified as phase $A$ and phase $B$) with different lattice parameters can exist, where phase $A$ has a lattice parameter smaller than phase $B$. In phase $A$, ${\text{B}}_{80}$ clusters are significantly distorted and two or four intercluster covalent bonds are formed for ${\text{K}}_{3}{\text{B}}_{80}$ or ${\text{Mg}}_{3}{\text{B}}_{80}$, respectively. In phase $B$, ${\text{B}}_{80}$ units are slightly distorted and no intercluster covalent bonds exist. The phase $A$ of ${\text{Mg}}_{3}{\text{B}}_{80}$ bears the largest cohesive energy among them and is more stable than the fcc ${\text{B}}_{80}$ solid. The charge population analysis shows that K and Mg are ionized and donate electrons to the other boron atoms of ${\text{K}}_{3}{\text{B}}_{80}$ and ${\text{Mg}}_{3}{\text{B}}_{80}$ solids. The different ionic radii of K and Mg lead to major geometrical differences between ${\text{K}}_{3}{\text{B}}_{80}$ and ${\text{Mg}}_{3}{\text{B}}_{80}$ solids and the competition of the covalent and ionic bondings could explain the emergence of two different geometrical phases for both. The electronic structural calculations reveal that both fcc ${\text{K}}_{3}{\text{B}}_{80}$ and ${\text{Mg}}_{3}{\text{B}}_{80}$ solids are metals.