Abstract:Recent experiments demonstrated that buried membrane-protein hydrogen-bonding is less energetically favorable than the values that are discussed in section 3.3 of this chapter 1. Double mutant cycle analysis allows for the analysis of the interaction of two particular amino acids to the exclusion of their interaction with the rest of the protein. Such analysis of bacteriarhodopsin showed that amino acids in the correct orientation for hydrogen bonding contribute stabilization energies between −1.7 and +0.4 kcal mol−1 with an average over 8 pairs of −0.6 kcal mol−1. This is approximately the same value as that of a hydrogen bond in a soluble protein, and is consistent with the notion that the core of membrane proteins and soluble proteins are biochemically similar. However, it should be noted that the burial of polar amino acids exerts a stablizing effect on membrane proteins beyond hydrogen bonding as well. Though hydrogen bonds may contribute less to the stability of a membrane protein than previously understood, this does not necessarily argue against the importance of the membrane protein hydrogen bond. The membrane protein's unfolded state is more similar-and therefore closer in energy-to its folded state than the unfolded soluble protein is to its folded state. Therefore, although the energy of the hydrogen bond is the same, the relative contribution of the hydrogen bond to the stability of the fold is greater in membrane proteins. This same study also showed a disparity between hydrogen bonding at lipid-exposed positions and at positions in the core of the protein. Distances between atoms and the strength of the bond between those atoms are tightly correlated. Analysis of the distance of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors in membrane proteins and in soluble proteins revealed that hydrogen bonding in buried positions of membrane proteins have a similar distance distribution to that of solvent exposed positions on soluble proteins. However, lipid-exposed hydrogen bonds are shorter, and thus likely exert a greater stabilizing effect than buried hydrogen bonds in the membrane. This is consistent with the change in dielectric constant for the two environments. Protein—protein interactions in the membrane are just beginning to be explored. Recently, significant advances have been made in disrupting protein—protein interactions in the membrane through protein design. These advances have allowed for the manipulation of biological processes in vivo, and have been shown to be useful probes for understanding the features that stabilize protein—protein interaction in the membrane. By bringing together information on how individual amino acids modulate transmembrane structure, what forces are responsible for oligomerization in the membrane, and how to computationally encode those concepts, a method has been established to create and disrupt protein—protein interactions in the membrane. This review aims to describe the necessity and utility of such probes, as well as provide a “how-to manual” for the design of such probes.

Exogenous Agents That Target Transmembrane Domains of Proteins

Development of Agents That Modulate Protein-Protein Interactions in Membranes.

Peptide Probes for Protein Transmembrane Domains

Protein Engineering Methods Applied to Membrane Protein Targets

Specific targeting of proteins to outer envelope membranes of endosymbiotic organelles, chloroplasts, and mitochondria

Membrane Proteins: Challenging Biotherapeutic Targets

Drugging Membrane Protein Interactions

Understanding Membrane Proteins. How to Design Inhibitors of Transmembrane Protein—Protein Interactions

De Novo Design of Transmembrane Nanopores

Mechanism Study of Proteins under Membrane Environment

De novo-designed transmembrane proteins bind and regulate a cytokine receptor

Advances in membrane mimetic systems for manipulation and analysis of membrane proteins; detergents, polymers, lipids and scaffolds

Cellular Membranes and Lipid-Binding Domains As Attractive Targets for Drug Development.

Optimizing properties of translocation-enhancing transmembrane proteins

Protein Translocation Through Α-Helical Channels and Insertases

Discovery of Therapeutic Antibodies Targeting Complex Multi-Spanning Membrane Proteins

DNA Probes for Monitoring Dynamic and Transient Molecular Encounters on Live Cell Membranes

Transmembrane dislocases: a second chance for protein targeting

Membrane Chemistry Tunes the Structure of a Peptide Transporter

Abstract LB-242: Dissecting Cell Signaling Mediated by Multi-spanning Transmembrane Domain Association

Membrane-Active Peptides Attack Cell Membranes in a Lipid-Regulated Curvature-Generating Mode