Abstract:Estimates of population density are fundamental to wildlife conservation and management. Distance sampling from line transects is a widely used sample count method and is most often analysed using Distance software. However, this method has limited capabilities with mobile populations (e.g., birds), which tend to encounter an observer more often than immobile ones. This paper presents a novel distance sampling method based on a different set of models and assumptions, named WildlifeDensity after its associated software. It is based on mechanistic modelling of visual detections of individuals or groups according to radial distance from the observer or perpendicular distance from the transect line. It also compensates for population–observer relative movement to avoid the detection overestimates associated with highly mobile populations. The models are introduced in detail and then tested in three ways: 1) WildlifeDensity is applied to several 'benchmark' populations of known density and no-to-low mobility, 2) the movement compensation model is tested on two highly mobile songbird populations, and 3) a fairly difficult case is analysed: a low-density, highly mobile bird population in a forest habitat. The results show that 1) using either radial or perpendicular distance data from surveys of immobile populations, WildlifeDensity provides similar estimates (and errors) to Distance , with radial WildlifeDensity analysis appearing to be slightly better for surveys of low-mobility populations (kangaroos), 2) the movement compensation model effectively removes the correlation between observer speed and detection numbers, and 3) WildlifeDensit y provides acceptable estimates where conventional Distance analysis overestimates density due to high movement. In summary, WildlifeDensity extends the capabilities of distance sampling by 1) compensating for movement, 2) not requiring complete detectability on the transect line and 3) supporting the use of radial distances, which simplifies fieldwork and increases measurement accuracy.

Comparative Study of Maximum Likelihood and Kernel Estimations for Density Estimation in Line Transect Sampling

Density estimation for grouped data with application to line transect sampling

A kernel estimate for the density of a biological population by using line transect sampling

Studying School Size Effects in Line Transect Sampling Using the Kernel Method

Selection of bandwidth type and adjustment side in kernel density estimation over inhomogeneous backgrounds

Animal abundance estimation in independent observer line transect surveys

Estimation in Independent Observer Line Transect Surveys for Clustered Populations

Distance-based Methods for Estimating Density of Nonrandomly Distributed Populations.

Efficient Bandwidth Selection for Kernel Density Estimation

Measurement errors in line transect surveys where detectability varies with distance and size.

Wildlife density estimation by distance sampling: A novel technique with movement compensation

Parameter identification based on adaptive density estimation

Nonparametric Estimation of Repeated Densities with Heterogeneous Sample Sizes

Numerical performance of Penalized Comparison to Overfitting for multivariate kernel density estimation

An Evaluation of the Accuracy of Kernel Density Estimators for Home Range Analysis

Bandwidth Selection for Kernel Density Estimation with a Markov Chain Monte Carlo Sample

An optimal transport approach for selecting a representative subsample with application in efficient kernel density estimation

Quantitative Comparison of Estimations for the Density Within Pedestrian Streams

Estimation of Population Size from Biased Samples Using Non-Parametric Binary Regression

Conditional Density Estimation via Weighted Logistic Regressions

Preliminary Exploration of Methods for Bird Population Density Survey and Estimation