Performance Comparison of LDPC Block and Spatially Coupled Codes over GF ≪inline-Formula> ≪tex-Math Notation="tex">$(q)$</tex-Math></inline-formula>

Kechao Huang,David G. M. Mitchell,Lai Wei,Xiao Ma,Daniel J. Costello
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tcomm.2015.2397433
IF: 6.166
2015-01-01
IEEE Transactions on Communications
Abstract:In this paper, we compare the finite-length performance of protograph-based spatially coupled low-density paritycheck (SC-LDPC) codes and LDPC block codes (LDPC-BCs) over GF(q). To reduce computational complexity and latency, a sliding window decoder with a stopping rule based on a soft belief propagation (BP) estimate is used for the q-ary SC-LDPC codes. Two regimes are considered: one when the constraint length of q-ary SC-LDPC codes is equal to the block length of q-ary LDPC-BCs and the other when the two decoding latencies are equal. Simulation results confirm that, in both regimes, (3,6)-, (3,9)-, and (3,12)-regular non-binary SC-LDPC codes can significantly outperform both binary and non-binary LDPC-BCs and binary SC-LDPC codes. Finally, we present a computational complexity comparison of q-ary SC-LDPC codes and q-ary LDPC-BCs under equal decoding latency and equal decoding performance assumptions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?