The use of the chimeric conjoint flap technique for complex defects reconstruction throughout the body: Clinical experience with 28 cases
Mario F Scaglioni,Matteo Meroni,Bruno Fuchs,Matthias Knobe,Elmar Fritsche
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30936
Microsurgery
Abstract:Background: Large soft tissue defects reconstruction represents a frequent and complex challenge in plastic surgery. A critical point regards the equilibrium between the need of large amount of tissue, while minimizing donor site morbidity. This is a common issue that plastic surgeons face in their clinical practice. In this context, the chimeric conjoint flap technique can be a valuable option, allowing to better exploit many well-known procedures. The purpose of the present work is to show the reconstructive efficacy and reliability of this technique resorting to many different well-known flaps. No such a comprehensive collection of cases is available so far dealing with this procedure. Patients and methods: Twenty-eight patients presenting large defects throughout the body were treated by means of different flaps, designed according to the chimeric conjoint flap concept. Patients' mean age was 61.9 years old (range 18-82 years), 20 were males and 8 females. The size of the defects ranged from 7 cm × 6 cm to 25 cm × 18 and presented shapes or localizations that were complex to be covered with a regular flap. The defects were located in 11 cases in the lower limbs, in 9 cases in the head and neck region, in 5 cases in the groin, and in 2 cases in the thorax. Cause of the defect was tumor resection in 20 cases, trauma-induced necrosis in 5 cases, Fournier's gangrene in 2 cases, and a chronic ulcer in 1 case. Fourteen flaps were free flaps while 14 were pedicled flaps. The chimeric conjoint flap technique consists in splitting the skin paddle a flap into two smaller island that can be rearranged in order to match the particular requirements of the recipient site. Different flaps were employed: the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap was used in 19 cases, latissimus dorsi (LD) musculocutaneous flap in 4 cases, deep inferior epigastric (DIEP) in 3 cases, medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) in 1 case, free radial forearm flap (RFFF) in 1 case. Results: All the 28 patients were successfully treated. In 6 cases minor complications were encountered, 5 at recipient site and 1 at donor site, who were all managed conservatively. No second procedures were required. The mean follow-up period was 8.4 months (range 3-12 months). At the last follow-up evaluation all the patients reached an acceptable cosmetic result and, when limbs were affected, complete range of motion restoration. Conclusions: The present case series provide promising evidence regarding the reliability and versatility of the chimeric conjoint flap technique for large and delicate defect reconstructions throughout the body.