Comparison of two UPS regulators: the 26S proteasome LID and the COP9 signalosome
Dawadschargal Dubiel,Wolfgang Dubiel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2024.1496862
IF: 5.5
2024-11-13
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Abstract:In this opinion we would like to compare two essential regulators of the ubiquitin proteasome system: The 26S proteasome (Hough et al., 1987) LID (Glickman et al., 1998) and the COP9 signalosome (CSN) (Chamovitz et al., 1996;Seeger et al., 1998). The LID and the BASE form the 19S regulator (RP), which determines the 20S proteasome or core particle (CP) action (Gorbea et al., 1999;Finley and Prado, 2020). While the LID has a metallodeubiquitylase activity on subunit RPN11 to cleave off the ubiquitin labeling of substrates, the BASE is formed by six heteromeric ATPases, which denature and linearize substrates in an ATP-dependent fashion before they enter the CP for degradation (Finley, 2009). The LID is a paralog particle of the CSN, which forms permanent complexes with cullin-RING-ubiquitin ligases (CRLs) regulating the E3 ligases (Dubiel et al., 2023). The paralog subunit of RPN11 in the CSN, the CSN5, has a similar metallodeubiquitylation active site, which removes NEDD8 from cullins inactivating CRLs (Cope et al., 2002). Active CSN-CRL complexes produce ubiquitin conjugates which are deubiquitylated and denatured in the RP for transfer into the PC for degradation.Many of the PC regulators were discovered in Rechsteiner's laboratory. The RP (Rechsteiner et al., 1993) consisting of the BASE subunits S4 or RPT2 and S7 or MSS1 or RPT1 (Dubiel et al., 1992a;Dubiel et al., 1993) and the LID subunit (Gorbea et al., 1999) S12 or Mov34 or RPN8 (Dubiel et al., 1995) and others. A completely different 20S modifier is the 11S regulator (Dubiel et al., 1992b) or PA28 (Ma et al., 1992), which is engaged in antigen processing/presentation (Rechsteiner et al., 2000;Schwarz et al., 2000). A nuclear CP activator, called proteasome activator 200 (PA200), was characterized in Mammals forming a complex with the 20S proteasome (Ustrell et al., 2002). Furthermore, Mammalian ECM29, a 26S proteasome-associated protein was identified determining the localization of the 26S proteasome (Ustrell et al., 2002). We were interested in the question whether the CSN is a regulator of the 20S enzyme?The 26S proteasome LID and the COP9 signalosome: Two paralog complexesThe LID and the CSN consist of 6 proteasome LID-CSN-initiation factor 3 (PCI) domain and 2 MPR1/PAD1 N-terminal (MPN) domain subunits (Figure 1) (Glickman et al., 1998;Hofmann and Bucher, 1998). The PCI domain proteins of the human LID are RPN3, RPN5, RPN6, RPN7, RPN9 and RPN12, whereas of the CSN are CSN1-CSN4, CSN7A and B as well as CSN8A and B. The MPN domain proteins in the LID and in the CSN are RPN11 and RPN8 or CSN5 and CSN6, respectively, form heterodimers (Forster et al., 2013) which are embedded into the "horseshoe" structure formed by the PCI domains (Figure 1). The MPN domain proteins will be discussed in detail in the next chapter. Interestingly, so far there are no paralog subunits in the LID as they were detected in human CSN: CSN7A and CSN7B as well as CSN8A and CSN8B. They determine appropriate variants called CSN CSN7A , CSN CSN7B , CSN CSN8A and CSN CSN8B , which occur simultaneously in most cells (Dubiel et al., 2023). The PCI domains are ordered in the LID as RPN9/RPN5/RPN6/RPN7/RPN3/RPN12 ring (Figure 1) (Forster et al., 2013). A similar arrangement can be found in the CSN as CSN7/CSN4/CSN2/CSN1/CSN3/CSN8 (Lingaraju et al., 2014). In the LID as well as in the CSN a helical bundle is formed by the C-termini of all subunits and lies over the PCI structure, the "horseshoe" (Figure 1) (Lingaraju et al., 2014). Under normal conditions, free subunit concentrations of the LID and the CSN complexes are very small and have no additional effects on cells. Only under pathological conditions can individual subunits be over-or under-expressed and exert disease-causing influences.In the LID the N-terminal domain of RPN6 binds to the CP subunit α2 and holds the RP together (Forster et al., 2013). RPN5 can also interact with the CP depending on 26S proteasome conformation (Greene et al., 2019). Many aspects of deubiquitylation of polyubiquitylated substrates by Rpn11 remain unclear (Forster et al., 2013). The MPN domain of Rpn11 is located over the AAA-ATPase N ring of the BASE, suggesting that one major function of the LID is to hold RPN11 in place. RPN8 is inactive but might contributing additional ubiquitin-like-binding interfaces (Forster et al., 2013). Disrupting LID-BASE interactions by mutations leads to significant degradation defects of the 26S proteasome (Greene et al., 2019). LID formation, probably also CSN assembly, is driven by the helical bundle (Estrin et al., 2013).The CSN interacts with the CRLs to deneddylate cullins (CULs) but it is also associated with unneddylated CRLs (Dubiel et al., 2023). Although the best described interactions between CSN and CRL are defined in a recombinant complex of CSN CSN7A -CRL4A (do not react preferentially with each other) (Dubiel et al., 2023), the in vitro data can be -Abstract Truncated-
cell biology,developmental biology