Neuroethics Questions to Guide Ethical Research in the International Brain Initiatives
Global Neuroethics Summit Delegates,Karen S Rommelfanger,Sung-Jin Jeong,Arisa Ema,Tamami Fukushi,Kiyoto Kasai,Khara M Ramos,Arleen Salles,Ilina Singh,Jordan Amadio,Guo-Qiang Bi,Paul Frederick Boshears,Adrian Carter,Anna Devor,Kenji Doya,Hermann Garden,Judy Illes,L Syd M Johnson,Lyric Jorgenson,Bang-Ook Jun,Inyoung Lee,Patricia Michie,Tsuyoshi Miyakawa,Eisuke Nakazawa,Osamu Sakura,Hagop Sarkissian,Laura Specker Sullivan,Stepheni Uh,David Winickoff,Paul Root Wolpe,Kevin Chien-Chang Wu,Akira Yasamura,Jialin C Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.021
IF: 16.2
2018-10-10
Neuron
Abstract:Increasingly, national governments across the globe are prioritizing investments in neuroscience. Currently, seven active or in-development national-level brain research initiatives exist, spanning four continents. Engaging with the underlying values and ethical concerns that drive brain research across cultural and continental divides is critical to future research. Culture influences what kinds of science are supported and where science can be conducted through ethical frameworks and evaluations of risk. Neuroscientists and philosophers alike have found themselves together encountering perennial questions; these questions are engaged by the field of neuroethics, related to the nature of understanding the self and identity, the existence and meaning of free will, defining the role of reason in human behavior, and more. With this Perspective article, we aim to prioritize and advance to the foreground a list of neuroethics questions for neuroscientists operating in the context of these international brain initiatives.