Abstract:A neuromyth is a commonly accepted but unscientific claim about brain function. Many researchers have claimed Howard Gardner's multiple intelligences (MI) theory is a neuromyth because they have seen no evidence supporting his proposal for independent brain-based intelligences for different types of cognitive abilities. Although Gardner has made claims that there are dedicated neural networks or modules for each of the intelligences, nonetheless Gardner has stated his theory could not be a neuromyth because he never claimed it was a neurological theory. This paper explains the lack of evidence to support MI theory. Most important, no researcher has directly looked for a brain basis for the intelligences. Moreover, factor studies have not shown the intelligences to be independent, and studies of MI teaching effects have not explored alternate causes for positive effects and have not been conducted by standard scientific methods. Gardner's MI theory was not a neuromyth initially because it was based on theories of the 1980s of brain modularity for cognition, and few researchers then were concerned by the lack of validating brain studies. However, in the past 40 years neuroscience research has shown that the brain is not organized in separate modules dedicated to specific forms of cognition. Despite the lack of empirical support for Gardner's theory, MI teaching strategies are widely used in classrooms all over the world. Crucially, belief in MI and use of MI in the classroom limit the effort to find evidence-based teaching methods. Studies of possible interventions to try to change student and teacher belief in neuromyths are currently being undertaken. Intervention results are variable: One research group found that teachers who knew more about the brain still believed education neuromyths. Teachers need to learn to detect and reject neuromyths. Widespread belief in a neuromyth does not make a theory legitimate. Theories must be based on sound empirical evidence. It is now time for MI theory to be rejected, once and for all, and for educators to turn to evidence-based teaching strategies.

Behind Popularity of MI: Fatal Weaknesses of the Theory of Multiple Intelligences

Multiple Intelligences Theory—Howard Gardner

Why multiple intelligences theory is a neuromyth

Inquiry into the Multiple Intelligence Theories to Set Up the Teaching Model of Four Independences for College Physical Education

Multiple Intelligences: The Theory In Practice, A Reader

Multiple Intelligences in Gifted and Talented Education: Lessons Learned From Neuroscience After 35 Years

The Impact of the Application of Multiple Intelligence Theory on Classroom Communication

Moral Positive Illusion: Self–other Valuation Difference in Moral Foundation Theory

Multiple intelligences and underachievement: lessons from individuals with learning disabilities

A Study on SUMIT:Some Inspirations

A Conceptual Analysis of the Semantic Use of Multiple Intelligences Theory and Implications for Teacher Education

The Implications of Integrating the Theory of Multiple Intelligences into English Language Learning Methodologies

Research on the Design of Adaptive Testing Based on Multiple Intelligences Theory and Its Impact on Student Learning Outcomes

Realizing the Balance and Integration of the Three Factors of Knowledge,Society and Human Being——the Inspiration of Multiple Intelligences Toward the Direction of Curriculum Reform

Multiple Intelligences in Teaching and Education: Lessons Learned from Neuroscience

Sternberg on Successful Intelligence and its Composition:Towards Success of Learning,Career and Life

A study on the bridge of music intelligence to Chinese comprehension

An Analysis of the Reasons for the Popularity of MBTI Personality Tests

Who Owns Intelligence

The study of high school English speaking teaching under the multiple intelligences theory

Shallow Discussion on the Theory and the Education Practice of Steinberg`s "the success intelligence"