Abstract:Lupus, Ahead of Print. ObjectiveTo assess the performance of the new EULAR/ACR criteria, particularly for early detection of cSLE, in comparison to the SLICC criteria among the pediatric population in multiple centers in Saudi Arabia.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study that enrolled pediatric patients up to the age of 14 years who've been diagnosed with SLE and followed in pediatric rheumatology clinics at 9 multi-tertiary hospitals in Saudi Arabia from 2010 to 2021 as a case group and were compared to a similar group of pediatric patients who've had defined rheumatological diseases other than SLE with a positive ANA titer (≥1:80) as controls. In total, 245 patients were included and distributed as 129 cases (diagnosed by expert pediatric rheumatologists) versus 116 patients in the control group. All relevant clinical information, including history, physical examination findings, and laboratory tests, was documented at the initial presentations. Then, the two sets of SLE classification criteria were applied to both groups to define who's going to meet both or either one of them. The exclusion criteria included those who had insufficient data or had overlapping or undifferentiated diseases. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), receiver operating curve (ROC), and accuracy were calculated for SLICC 2012 and EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria (total scores≥ 10 and ≥ 13). We performed a Chi-squared test to compare sensitivity and specificity of SLICC 2012 and EULAR/ACR 2019.ResultsFor SLICC (cut-off ≥4 criteria), the sensitivity was found to be 96.9% (95% CI 92.6%–99.4%) and the specificity was 94.8% (95% CI 89.6%–98.32%), with PPV and NPV of 95.4% and 96.5%, respectively. The ROC for it was 0.96 (95% CI 0.93–0.99), and this criterion had an accuracy of 95%. Regarding EULAR/ACR (total score ≥ 10), the performance measure showed a sensitivity of 99.2% and a specificity of 86.2%. Similarly, PPV was 88.9%; while NPV was a little higher (99.0%) than SLICC. The ROC for EULAR/ACR (total score ≥ 10) was 0.93 (95% CI 0.89–0.96), and this criterion had an accuracy of 93%. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the sensitivity and specificity of either using SLICC or EULAR/ACR (total score ≥ 10), as reflected by a p-value of 0.86 using the Chi-squared test. Although applying the EULAR/ACR with a total score of ≥ 13 revealed lower sensitivity (93.8%) than both the SLICC and the EULAR/ACR (total score ≥ 10), the specificity for it was found to increase up to 91.4% (85.7–96.2%) compared to the (86.2%) specificity of the EULAR/ACR (total score ≥ 10).ConclusionIn this cohort among the Saudi population with childhood-onset SLE, the new EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria efficiently enable early detection of SLE, although a more frequent rate of false positives was observed with them. Escalating the total score from ≥ 10 to ≥ 13 in the cSLE population improved the specificity close to that of SLICC 2012. Further prospective studies in pediatrics need to be done for the validation of a cut- off score of ≥ 13 in cSLE rather than the traditional score of ≥ 10 in aSLE.

Comparison of Diagnostic Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Children Between China and Foreign Country

A comparison and review of three sets of classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus for distinguishing systemic lupus erythematosus from pure mucocutaneous manifestations in the lupus disease spectrum

Health-related Quality of Life of Children with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Well-Being of Caregivers: a Cross-Sectional Survey in China

Clinical value of 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus

Proxy-reported Health-Related Quality of Life of Children with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Well-Being of Caregivers: a Cross-Sectional Survey among Caregivers in China.

Evaluation of the 2019 EULAR/ACR Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Children and Adults

The Diagnosis Criteria of SLE and Its Development

Diagnostic performance of classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus: A validation study from Singapore

Comparison of Five Activity Criteria of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Comparison of the Clinical Characteristics of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Between Children and Adults

Systemic lupus international collaborating clinics-2012 and European league against rheumatism/American college of rheumatology-2019 classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus associated with childhood-onset auto-immune cytopenia

Comparison of systemic lupus international collaborating clinics 2012 classification criteria and European league against rheumatism/American college of rheumatology 2019 classification criteria for early detection of childhood onset systemic lupus erythematosus (multi-center study)

Chinese Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Treatment and Research Group Registry IX: Clinical Features and Survival of Childhood-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in China

Development and Validation of New Diagnostic Criteria for Atopic Dermatitis in Children of China.

Clinical Manifestations, Immunological Features And Prognosis Of Chinese Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Single-Center Study

THU0036 Discriminating Central Nervous System Infection and Neuropsychiatric Involvement in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Single-Center Experience

The Performance of Different Anti-Dsdna Autoantibodies Assays in Chinese Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients

Clinical and laboratorial outcome of different age-onset systemic lupus erythematosus patients in Jiangsu, China: a multicentre retrospective study

Clinical Analysis of 86 Cases of SLE Complicated with Infection in Children

Clinical Characteristics and Labial Gland Pathological Features in Children with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Complicated by Sjögren's Syndrome

Clinical Features of Interstitial Lung Diseases with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Children