Abstract:The discoveries of several Pnictogen and Chalcogen Iron compounds, with contiguous Antiferromagnetism, high temperature Superconductivity, and structural transitions in their phase diagram as a function of dopants, has been followed by intense activity, both theoretical and experimental. The level of activity does not rival the frenzy in the decade following the discovery of superconductivity in the cuprates, but is only an order of magnitude lower. The compounds have well separated layers of Fe and superconductivity appears below a region of anomalous non-Fermi-liquid transport properties characteristic of quantum-critical fluctuations. In this respect, the problem is less perplexing than the cuprates, where the non-Fermi-liquid properties above superconductivity have, at one boundary in the phase diagram, a much more subtle transition than the easily observed Antiferromagnetism in the ironics (a term used to describe such compounds which I heard Sri Raghu use at the KITP workshop on this problem last fall). But unlike in the Cuprates, there are multiple bands from the closely spaced Fe-orbitals near the Fermi-surface and not too far below and above it because Fe is near the middle of the 3d-transition metal series. The near orbital degeneracy introduces intra-atomic Hund's rule correlations together with inter-atomic interactions and appears much more complicated at the level of the minimal Hamiltonian. But is it so at the level of basic principles? One outlook has been that the interactions parameters, though numerous are not much larger than the kinetic energy parameters. So, why not address the problem by using the all-purpose calculations of the density functional type, (too numerous to refer to here but referred in the papers highlighted and below) which have rationalized through imaginative use the properties of so many magnetic metals and compounds. The difficulty in Cuprates, which led to rejection of such methods, that they predict the 1/2 filled state to be a metal are absent in the Ironics. And the ground state properties like itinerant Antiferromagnetism can be obtained by the spin-polarized density functional methods. Being variational,

Pairing Strength and Symmetries of (k,tl)fexse2 in Comparison with Iron Pnictides

Pairing symmetries of several families of iron-based superconductors and some similarities with cuprates and heavy-fermions

Orbital selective pairing and superconductivity in iron selenides

The Ironics : Strong Coupling or Weak Coupling in the Wonderland

Pseudospin-triplet pairing in iron-chalcogenide superconductors

Superconductivity and Magnetism in (tl, K, Rb)Fexse2

Crossover from Weak to Strong Pairing in Unconventional Superconductors

Functional renormalization group study of the pairing symmetry and pairing mechanism in iron-selenide superconductors

From D-Wave to S-Wave Pairing in the Iron-Pnictide Superconductor (Ba,k)fe2as2

Fermi surface nesting induced strong pairing in iron-based superconductors

Robustness of s-wave pairing symmetry in iron-based superconductors and its implications to fundamentals on magnetically-driven high temperature superconductivity

A Unifying Phase Diagram with Correlation-Driven Superconductor-To-Insulator Transition for the 122*series of Iron Chalcogenides

Functional Renormalization Group Study of Pairing Symmetry and Pairing Mechanism in Iron-Selenide Superconductors

Pairing Symmetry in the Iron-Pnictide Superconductor KFe2As2

Pairing symmetry of heavy fermion superconductivity in the two-dimensional Kondo-Heisenberg lattice model

Common Structural and Magnetic Framework in the A2Fe4Se5 Superconductors

Crossover of the pairing symmetry from $s$- to $d$-wave in iron pnictide superconductors

Unified picture for the order parameter and mechanism of iron based superconductors

Unconventional Pairing in Single FeSe Layers

Electron pairing in the presence of incipient bands in iron-based superconductors