Abstract:ObjectiveSeveral observational studies have demonstrated that increased nutritional delivery by supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) plus enteral nutrition (EN) reduces the rate of all-cause mortality in critically ill patients. Therefore, we aimed to compare and evaluate the effect of SPN plus EN on all-cause mortality in critically ill adults.MethodsRandomized controlled trials were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and Sinomed (up to May 2021). Adults with severe illness treated with SPN plus EN or with EN alone were enrolled. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale, and a meta-analysis was conducted using Stata software. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality and was evaluated by pooled odds ratio (OR) with the fixed-effects model. Required information size was also calculated using trial sequential analysis.ResultsWe identified 10 randomized controlled trials, with a total of 6,908 patients. No significant differences in rate of all-cause mortality (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.84–1.09, P = 0.518), intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (OR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.75–1.07, P = 0.229), and hospital mortality (OR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.82–1.10, P = 0.482) were found between the SPN plus EN and EN alone groups. SPN plus EN support was associated with a significantly decreased risk of infection (OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.74–0.93, P = 0.001), although the duration of mechanical ventilation [standardized mean difference (SMD) = − 0.20], length of hospital stay (SMD = 0.12), and ICU stay (SMD = − 0.57) were similar between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Meta-regression analyses showed no significant correlations between all-cause mortality and baseline clinical factors, including patients’ age, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, time of SPN initiation, and follow-up duration (all P > 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed that SPN plus EN support was associated with a trend toward decreased rate of all-cause mortality in studies with follow-up < 30 days (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.36–1.02, P = 0.058). Trial sequence analysis showed that the required information size for all-cause mortality was 16,972, and the cumulative Z-curve indicated no significant differences in the risk of all-cause mortality between the two groups (P > 0.05).ConclusionSPN plus EN support can significantly reduce the risk of infection, although it has no significant effect on all-cause mortality among critically ill patients. More studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Early Parenteral Nutrition Alone or Accompanying Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Early Parenteral Nutrition Alone or Accompanying Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Early Versus Delayed Enteral Nutrition In Critically Ill Patients: A Meta-Analysis Of Randomized Controlled Trials

Early Enteral Nutrition Support Dose Selection in Critically Ill Patients: a Meta Analysis

No Bene Fi T of Higher Protein Dosing in Critically Ill Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

No Benefit of Higher Protein Dosing in Critically Ill Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Early Parenteral Nutrition Comparing to Enteral Nutrition Cannot Reduce 28-Day Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: a Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study Based on the MIMIC-IV Database

The effect of enteral versus parenteral nutrition for critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Enteral versus parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Effect of Supplemental Parenteral Nutrition Versus Enteral Nutrition Alone on Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Initial Energy Supplementationin Critically Ill Patients Receiving Enteral Nutrition: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Meta-Analysis of Early Enteral Nutrition Provided Within 24 Hours of Admission on Clinical Outcomes in Acute Pancreatitis

Enteral versus parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients with severe pancreatitis: a meta-analysis

Parenteral Nutrition: Current Use, Complications, and Nutrition Delivery in Critically Ill Patients

Effectiveness of Enteral Feeding Protocol on Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: A Before and after Study

Comparison of Postpyloric Tube Feeding and Gastric Tube Feeding in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Meta-Analysis

The Effectiveness of Early Enteral Nutrition on Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Sepsis Patients: A Systematic Review

The clinical effect of early enteral nutrition in liver-transplanted patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Meta-analysis: Total Parenteral Nutrition Versus Total Enteral Nutrition in Predicted Severe Acute Pancreatitis

Intravenous Amino Acids May Mediate the Adverse Effect of Early Parenteral Nutrition on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation: A Post Hoc Analysis of the NEED Trial.

Effect of Supplemental Parenteral Nutrition on All-Cause Mortality in Critically Ill Adults: A Meta-Analysis and Subgroup Analysis