Trends for Managing Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Taiwan

Wai-Yan Wong,Shyh-Chyan Chen,Shih‐Chieh Chueh,Jun Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7024/juaroc.200203.0025
2002-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To investigate the current trend of Taiwanese urologists in managing benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). This study can help establish our own consensus, recommend appropriate diagnostic tools, and offer ideal treatment options to related patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From November 2000 to April 2001, a questionnaire concerning the tools used for establishing a diagnosis of BPH, treatment options in different hierarchies associated with various sizes of the prostate currently and 5 years ago was mailed to each of the 465 urologists in active practice in Taiwan. RESULTS: A total of 240 physicians (51.6%) responded to the questionnaire. For evaluation of severity of BPH, more than 2/3 of the surgeons did not depend on serum creatinine, cystoscopy, intravenous urography, or residual urine as adjuvant tools. Of these subjects, 89.1% would add serum prostatic-specific antigen to detect suspected malignancy, and 86.7% of them believed the International Prostate Symptoms Score was essentially valuable. Regarding current treatment and a comparison with treatment 5 years ago, surgeons still preferred using a-blocker for medical therapy. Transurethral resection of the prostate remained the most popular procedure for a medium-sized enlarged prostate with 87.5% of surgeons maintaining this choice, and increasing acceptance for huge prostates of from 64% to 84%. On the other hand, the use of finasteride dropped from 10% to 1.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The trends of treating BPH we report herein can provide useful insights into variations in clinical practice among Taiwanese urologists and may help in the development of more widely accepted guidelines by our urological community
What problem does this paper attempt to address?