New Insights into the Prognostic Value of Ki-67 Labeling Index in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Shuang Hao,Zhimin Shao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.e12031
IF: 45.3
2014-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e12031 Background: The clinical-pathological importance of Ki-67 labeling index (LI) in breast cancers has been intensely studied; however, the prognostic relevance in triple negative (TN) subtype has not been demonstrated. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the relevance of Ki-67 LI and age for the identification of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype. Methods: A total of 571 female TNBC patients operated and diagnosed at our institution from January 2002 to June 2011 were categorized by Ki-67 LI and diagnosed age. Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test were used for survival analysis. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to determine the association of Ki-67 LI and diagnosed age with breast-cancer specific survival (BCSS) outcomes. A varying-coefficient Cox model was used to describe the effect of Ki-67 on the BCSS outcomes changing with diagnosed age after adjustment for disease characteristics. Results: Of the 571 patients, median age and Ki-67 LI were 50 years and 35%, and median follow-up time of 44.5 months (range 2.2–139.1). The 5-year BCSS was 83%. Based on the analysis results, there was no prognostic significance in Ki-67 LI in all patients. When analyzing age of diagnosis as a continuous variable, the hazard ratio (HR) of Ki-67 LI>35% to Ki-67 LI≤35% of breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) increased in a S-shaped curve with increasing diagnosed age up to about 50 years old and remained higher risks for high Ki-67 LI. When focused on the patients being diagnosed at age≤50 years, the BCSS was 84% , respectively, with an adjusted HR low Ki-67 LI vs. high of 0.36 (95 % CI 0.14–0.99, P=0.04). However, in the patients being diagnosed at age>50 years, low Ki-67 LI revealed to have a better prognosis (adjusted P=0.22, >0.05). Based on the data from the large cohort of a clinical cancer registry, it was demonstrated that Ki-67 LI has different significance in patients of different age groups. Conclusions: Lower proliferation measured by Ki-67 has poor prognosis relevance in TNBC of patients diagnosed≤50 years old, which is different with Luminal A subtype. Further validation of the clinical significance of Ki-67 LI need to be demonstrated, which is essential for this group of breast tumors.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?