Abstract:Objectives: To compare the long-term skeletal stability following maxillary advancement using Rigid External Distraction (RED) in growing and non-growing patients with Cleft Lip and Palate (CLP). Methods: Data sources: A systematic literature search was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines from database inception till August 2020 in MEDLINE-PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Science Direct, Google Scholar and a manual search in the institutional library. Study eligibility criteria, participants and intervention: All available literature published in English, with a minimum of six human subjects with well-defined age range either 7-14.9 years or 15-30 years, follow up period of a minimum of 12 months assessing the skeletal stability as horizontal change at Point A (Subspinale) following maxillary advancement using a RED device, without the use of rigid internal fixation or bone grafts were included in the study. Study appraisal and synthesis method: The quality assessment of selected articles was done using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The meta-analysis was carried out with Q statistic method, I-squared statistics, fixed-effect model to estimate pooled mean and Begg-Mazumdar bias indicator. Results: Selected nine articles that were qualitatively assessed for relapse rate following maxillary advancement using a RED device, showed consistent and stable results. The meta-analysis found no significant difference in long-term skeletal stability of maxillary advancement by RED device in growing and non-growing patients with CLP [(growing group: Pooled proportion = 0.2927; 95% CI = 0.1534 to 0.4319) (non-growing group: Pooled proportion = 0.23077; 95% CI = 0.09854 to 0.36300)]. Limitations: No study, as revealed by the search, was available that compared the two groups as defined by the inclusion criteria. Data for the two groups were retrieved from different studies and meta-analysed. Conclusion: RED is an effective modality for correction of maxillary hypoplasia secondary to CLP, requiring large maxillary advancement. The technique can be used in young and adult patients with similar long-term results. Prospero registration number: CRD42020205513.

The Changes of Racial Profile after Rigid External Distraction in Cleft Lip and Plate Patients

The Changes of Facial Profile after RED in Cleft Lip and Plate Patients

SOFT TISSUE PROFILE CHANGES IN CLEFT LIP AND PALATE PATIENTS AFTER MAXILLARY DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS

Correction of Jaw Deformities in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients by Orthognathic Surgery

Comparative study of different osteotomy modalities in maxillary distraction osteogenesis for cleft lip and palate.

A Comparative Study of Skeletal and Dental Outcome between Transcutaneous External Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis and Conventional Rigid External Device in Treating Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

Clinical Evaluation on the Anterior Maxillary Segmental Distraction with Rigid External Distraction in the Treatment of Severe Maxillary Hypoplasia Secondary to CLP

Internal Midface Distraction In Correction Of Severe Maxillary Hypoplasia Secondary To Cleft Lip And Palate

Primary study of the long-term stability of maxillary distraction with rigid external distractor

Long-term patient-reported outcomes after anterior distraction osteogenesis of the maxilla in patients with cleft

Comparison of long-term skeletal stability following maxillary advancement using rigid external distraction in growing and non-growing patients with cleft lip and palate: a systematic review and meta-analysis

[Effects of maxillary distraction osteogenesis on the velopharyngeal configuration of cleft palate patients].

Complications of External Maxillary Distraction in Cleft Lip and Palate: Lessons Learned and Keys to Success

Maxillary anterior segmental distraction osteogenesis to correct maxillary hypoplasia and dental crowding in cleft palate patients: a preliminary study

[Application of Distraction Osteogenesis in Severe Maxillary Hypoplasia Secondary to Cleft Palate].

Maxillary Protraction Therapy in Class III Patients with and Without Cleft Lip and Palate: an Interim Report of a Prospective Comparative Study

[Factors associated with the outcome of maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate patients].

Skeletal Stability after Maxillary Advancement with Orthognatic Surgery in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate

STABILITY OF TRANSVERSE OCCLUSIONS AFTER LE FORT I SURGERY USING REINFORCED SPLINT IN CLEFT LIP AND PALATE PATIENTS

Cephalometric Evaluation of Distraction Osteogenesis with Tooth-borne Distractor for Patients with Mid-facial Deformity after Lip and Palate Operation.

Effects of anterior maxillary distraction compared to LeFort-1 osteotomy and total maxillary distraction osteogenesis for treating hypoplastic maxilla in patients with cleft lip and palate- A systematic review and meta-analysis