Urinary 1-Hydroxypyrene Glucuronide: A Sensitive Exposure Marker of PAHs at Low Levels Encountered in Ambient Air

Yu Hu,Zhenming Zhou,Xiaonan Xue,Xiaomei Li,Junjie Fu,Beverly S. Cohen,Assieh A. Melikian,Meng-Shong Tang,Nirmal Kumar Roy,Jui‐Hung Sun,Qingshan Qu
IF: 11.2
2005-01-01
Cancer Research
Abstract:2186 A biomarker validation study has been being conducted in a Chinese population with occupational or environmental exposures to PAHs. So far, 106 subjects have been recruited from coke oven workers (workers), residents in a metropolitan area (residents), and gardeners in suburb (gardeners). All subjects were monitored twice for their personal exposures to PAHs. The biological samples were collected for measurements of 1-hydroxypyrene (1-OHP) in urine and identification of polymorphisms of genes encoding for metabolic enzymes, including CYP1A1, microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH), and GSTM1 in lymphocytes. The average personal exposure levels of pyrene, benz (a) anthracene (BaA) and benzo (a) pyrene (BaP) in exposed workers were 15.1 ± 48.2 μg/m3, 4.4 ± 8.3 μg/m3 and 4.3 ±9.9 μg/m3, respectively. The corresponding levels in residents were 0.057 ± 0.004 μg/m3, 0.034 ± 0.003 μg/m3 and 0.028 ± 0.002 μg/m3, and those in gardeners were 0.016 ± 0.017 μg/m3, 0.022 ± 0.011 μg/m3, and 0.011 ± 0.011 μg/m3 respectively. The conjugate of 1-OHP with glucuronide (1-OHP-G) is the predominant form of pyrene metabolite in urine and showed strong associations with exposures not only to pyrene but also to BaA, BaP, and total PAHs. Most importantly, a significant difference in 1-OHP-G was even detected between gardeners and residents with exposures to BaP at 0.011 and 0.028 μg/m3, suggesting that 1-OHP-G is a good marker that can be used for risk assessment of BaP exposure at ambient levels. Furthermore, multiple regression analyses of 1-OHP-G on PAHs exposure indicated that smoking was an important confounding factor on urinary 1-OHP-G level, especially when exposure to low level of environmental PAHs. The potential effects of gene polymorphisms on the formation of 1-OHP-G were examined based on either individual genotype or combination of genotypes of the four. However, none of the examinations showed any significant association of 1-OHP-G with polymorphisms of CYP1A1, mEH, GSTM1, and GSTT1 probably due to relatively small number of samples (supported by grants: OH007632; ES00260).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?