Does Distance Still Matter in Facilitating Social Ties? the Roles of Mobility Patterns and the Built Environment

Cynthia Chen,Yingqian Mei,Yu Liu
2014-01-01
Abstract:In this paper, the authors argue that spatial proximity, measured in residential distance, though still matters, probably is not the most important facilitator for social interactions. People’s mobility patterns, both at an individual level and at a pair level, can be an equally important factor if not more. The authors tested this hypothesis by utilizing a unique mobile phone dataset with both location information and calling information for a large urbanized city in China. Through this dataset, the authors are able to identify social ties as well as calculate various measures on spatial proximity and mobility patterns. The analyses were carried out both at the individual level for the number of social ties and at the pair level for the strength of a tie. The results appear to confirm the hypothesis: social ties, both in terms of scope (number of social ties) and strength, are closely related to mobility patterns attributes; more than to the spatial proximity measure. The authors also evaluate the role of the built environment in affecting social ties and show that though living in a dense area can potentially increase the number of social ties, but the effect is very small. There are two simple takeaways from the paper: first, if you want to have more friends, visit new places often; you do not need to travel far though; second, if you want to strengthen an existing tie, visit new places often and those places that will bring your mobility pattern closer to that of the other party.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?