Author Response: an Eya1-Notch Axis Specifies Bipotential Epibranchial Differentiation in Mammalian Craniofacial Morphogenesis
Haoran Zhang,Li Wang,Elaine Wong,Sze Lan Tsang,Pin-Xian Xu,Urban Lendahl,Mai Har Sham
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.30126.031
2017-01-01
Abstract:Article Figures and data Abstract Introduction Results Discussion Materials and methods References Decision letter Author response Article and author information Metrics Abstract Craniofacial morphogenesis requires proper development of pharyngeal arches and epibranchial placodes. We show that the epibranchial placodes, in addition to giving rise to cranial sensory neurons, generate a novel lineage-related non-neuronal cell population for mouse pharyngeal arch development. Eya1 is essential for the development of epibranchial placodes and proximal pharyngeal arches. We identify an Eya1-Notch regulatory axis that specifies both the neuronal and non-neuronal commitment of the epibranchial placode, where Notch acts downstream of Eya1 and promotes the non-neuronal cell fate. Notch is regulated by the threonine phosphatase activity of Eya1. Eya1 dephosphorylates p-threonine-2122 of the Notch1 intracellular domain (Notch1 ICD), which increases the stability of Notch1 ICD and maintains Notch signaling activity in the non-neuronal epibranchial placodal cells. Our data unveil a more complex differentiation program in epibranchial placodes and an important role for the Eya1-Notch axis in craniofacial morphogenesis. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30126.001 Introduction Craniofacial morphogenesis depends on integration of signals from multiple cell types and is a complex morphogenetic process requiring, among other structures, the genesis of cranial placodes and pharyngeal arches. The cranial placodes are ectodermal thickening structures derived from the pre-placodal primordium, an ectodermal region adjacent to the neural plate (Baker and Bronner-Fraser, 2001). The cranial placodes are divided into the anterior (adenohypophyseal, olfactory and lens placodes), intermediate (trigeminal placode) and posterior placodes (otic, lateral line and epibranchial placodes) (Streit, 2007; Saint-Jeannet and Moody, 2014; Singh and Groves, 2016) (Figure 1A). The epibranchial placodes comprise the geniculate, petrosal and nodose placodes, which contribute to the cranial nerve VII (facial), IX (glossopharyngeal) and X (vagus), respectively (D'Amico-Martel and Noden, 1983). It is believed that the principle function of the epibranchial placodes is to produce viscero-sensory neurons by delaminating cells that undergo neuronal differentiation (Narayanan and Narayanan, 1980). In contrast, the olfactory and otic placodes also generate non-neuronal secretory or supporting cells, in addition to delaminating neuronal cells (Patthey et al., 2014). The pharyngeal arches (PA) are transient structures formed in the pharyngeal region of the early embryonic head and interactions of the pharyngeal epithelium, the endoderm, neural crest and mesenchyme give rise to facial, head and neck structures during development (Figure 1A). A key aspect of PA formation is the segmentation process, during which the pharyngeal endoderm extends laterally towards the ectoderm, forming an epithelial pocket called the pharyngeal pouch, while the surface ectoderm invaginates and forms the pharyngeal cleft (Graham, 2003). The contact between ectodermal cleft and endodermal pouch forms the segmental plate, which gradually extends proximal-distally to define the boundary between each PA, and restricts the route for neural crest migration into each arch (Graham et al., 2005; Shone and Graham, 2014). The segmental contact points are also sources of signaling factors that regulate the anterior-posterior and proximal-distal patterning of the PA and promote mesenchymal cell survival (Trumpp et al., 1999; Couly et al., 2002; David et al., 2002). The relationship between epibranchial placodes and PA development is poorly understood, but the notion that the geniculate, petrosal and nodose placodes are located near the pharyngeal clefts (Figure 1A), suggests that they are part of the coordinated development of the corresponding PA. Figure 1 with 1 supplement see all Download asset Open asset Cranial placode and pharyngeal arch development in wildtype and Eya1-/- mouse embryos. (A) Schematic summary of the development of cranial placodes and pharyngeal arches (PA) in mouse embryos. The pre-placodal region, marked by expression of Eya and Six families of genes at E8.0, is divided into anterior, medial and posterior placodal regions at E8.5, which further develops into specific cranial placodes (A, adenohypophyseal; O, olfactory; L, lens; T, trigeminal; Gen, geniculate; Pet, petrosal; Nod, nodose) from E8.5–9.5. The epibranchial placodes are located in close proximity to the pharyngeal segmental plates (circled with black dotted lines). The grey dashed line indicates the plane of coronal section, which reveals the pharyngeal segmental plates and arch structures as shown in the diagram on the right (also panel D and E). The PA structures include the pharyngeal ectoderm (red), endoderm (blue) and the transient pharyngeal segmental plates, which form the clefts and pouches. The neural crest, mesoderm and aortic arch arteries are indicated in purple, green and white, respectively. (B and C) Lateral view of wildtype (WT) and Eya1-/- whole mount E9.5 embryos. Open arrowheads indicate positions of pharyngeal clefts; PA1 and PA2 are numbered (n > 20). (D and E) Immunostaining for E-cadherin (green) and DAPI (blue) on coronal sections of WT and Eya1-/- E9.5 embryos. Arrowheads indicate positions of the pharyngeal segmental plates, which are not formed in Eya1-/- embryos (n = 4). (F and G) Whole-mount in situ hybridization showing Crabp1 expression in WT and Eya1-/- E9.5 embryos (n = 5). (H and I) Scanning electron microscopy images of WT and Eya1-/- embryos at E10. White bracket in WT embryo indicates the proximal region of PA2, which was missing in Eya1-/- embryos (indicated by arrow) (n = 5). (J–O) Expression of Dlx1, Dlx5 and Brn1 in WT and Eya1-/- E9.5 embryos. White brackets indicate the proximal region of PA2 in WT embryos. Arrows indicate the missing proximal PA2 in Eya1-/- embryos (n > 5). Scale bars, 100 µm. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30126.002 Figure 1—source data 1 Source data relating to Figure 1—figure supplement 1E. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30126.004 Download elife-30126-fig1-data1-v2.xlsx Eya and Six transcription factors are highly evolutionarily conserved and among the first factors expressed across the pre-placodal region where they are critical regulators of placodal cell differentiation in later stages (Kozlowski et al., 2005; Chen et al., 1997; Pandur and Moody, 2000; Christophorou et al., 2009; Zou et al., 2004; Saint-Jeannet and Moody, 2014). Six proteins are DNA-binding activator proteins that promote expression of pre-placodal genes when partnered with Eya. In contrast, Eya does not bind DNA directly, but acts as the transactivating partner to Six proteins. The importance of Eya and Six proteins for craniofacial development is underscored by that mutations in the human EYA1 and SIX genes, including SIX1 and SIX5, are reported in approximately 50% of the patients suffering from Branchio-Oto-Renal (BOR) syndrome (Abdelhak et al., 1997; Smith, 1993). Eya1 mutant mouse embryos display phenotypes in multiple pharyngeal and placodal derivatives including cranial neural crest cell-derived bones and cartilages, endoderm-derived tympanic cavity, thymus, thyroid and parathyroid glands, ectoderm-derived external auditory canal, otic and epibranchial placodes (Xu et al., 1999, 2002; Zou et al., 2004, 2006). Six1-/- and Six4-/- mouse embryos also exhibit pharyngeal phenotypes along with kidney problems (Laclef et al., 2003; Zou et al., 2006), in keeping with a tight functional coupling between Eya and Six proteins. However, the Eya1 protein does not only serve as a transcriptional co-activator, but also possesses tyrosine and threonine phosphatase activities (Li et al., 2003; Okabe et al., 2009; Tadjuidje and Hegde, 2013). The tyrosine phosphatase activity of Eya1 regulates H2AX and DNA repair (Cook et al., 2009) and is also required for the function of Eya1 as a transactivator in conjunction with Six (Li et al., 2003). Less is known about the threonine phosphatase activity, but dephosphorylation of T58 in c-Myc by Eya1 has been shown to be important for nephrogenesis and tumour growth (Xu et al., 2014; Li et al., 2017). Craniofacial development is regulated by Notch signalling. Genetic and pharmacological inhibition of Notch results in proximal PA and craniofacial defects as well as premature neurogenesis and neuronal delamination (Humphreys et al., 2012; Zuniga et al., 2010; Daudet and Lewis, 2005; de la Pompa et al., 1997; Lassiter et al., 2010; Lassiter et al., 2014). Conversely, activation of Notch in the cranial placodes prevents both neurogenesis and delamination and expands the placodal epithelium (Jayasena et al., 2008; Pan et al., 2013). The Notch signalling pathway is an evolutionarily ancient cell-cell communication system that controls differentiation in most tissues and organs. Upon activation by ligand on a juxtaposed cell, the Notch receptor is proteolytically processed and the final cleavage, which is executed by the γ-secretase complex, liberates the C-terminal portion of the Notch receptor, the Notch intracellular domain (Notch ICD). Notch ICD is translocated into the nucleus to form a complex with the DNA-binding protein CSL, which converts CSL from a repressor to an activator, leading to activation of Notch downstream genes, including Hes and Hey genes (Siebel and Lendahl, 2017). Notch gene dosage and the level of Notch receptor mediated signaling have profound impact on cell fate decision in many cell types during development (Andersson and Lendahl, 2014). Here we address novel roles of Eya1 in regulating PA and epibranchial placode differentiation. We show that Eya1 is required for proper proximal PA, pharyngeal cleft and pouch formation. We also provide evidence that epibranchial placodes are not limited to generating viscero-sensory neurons only, but contain bipotential epithelial progenitors that in addition produce a non-neuronal cell lineage important for PA development. We further identified Notch1 ICD as a novel target of the threonine phosphatase activity of Eya1. Dephosphorylation leads to stabilization of Notch1 ICD and enhanced Notch signaling. Our data provide evidence for a more complex composition of epibranchial placodes and an Eya1-Notch axis important for PA formation and craniofacial morphogenesis. Results Eya1-/- embryos exhibit defective pharyngeal arch segmentation and lack proximal arch structures The first PA became morphologically identifiable at E8.5, at this stage wildtype and mutant PA appeared grossly comparable in size and morphology (data not shown). In contrast, at E9.5, Eya1-/- embryos showed hypoplastic second and third PA with barely visible pharyngeal clefts (Figure 1B and C). E-cadherin immunostaining, which labeled the ectodermal and endodermal epithelia, revealed that the pharyngeal segmental plates were not formed. There were no contact points between the pharyngeal ectoderm and endoderm-derived epithelia, such that the pharyngeal clefts and pouches could not form properly and the pharyngeal mesenchyme in adjacent PA never separated (Figure 1D and E). In E10 Eya1-/- embryos the PA2 was shortened, with an apparent reduction of the proximal portion, while the distal part was still present (Figure 1H and I). To assess this further, we performed in situ hybridization with three markers that have distinct expression patterns along the proximal-distal axis: Dlx1 (expressed in both the proximal and distal parts), Dlx5 (expressed only in the distal part) and Brn1 (Pou3f3; expressed only in the proximal part) (Jeong et al., 2008). At E9.5, Dlx1 expression was lost in the Eya1-/- embryos in the proximal portion of the PA, but retained in the distal arches (Figure 1J and K). Dlx5 was expressed in the distal region in both wildtype and Eya1-/- embryos (Figure 1L and M), whereas Brn1 expression was lost in proximal PA2 in Eya1-/- embryos but expressed in the maxillary-mandibular junction of PA1 and proximal region of PA2 in wildtype (Figure 1N and O). We examined the expression of the neural crest marker gene Crabp1 and confirmed that the migrating neural crest stream in the PA2 was reduced in the Eya1-/- embryos (Figure 1F and G). TUNEL analysis revealed that the Eya1-/- embryos displayed increased cell death at the dorsal level around the entrances of PA1 and PA2 (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A–1E). Taken together, the analysis of the Eya1-/- phenotype shows that the abnormal pharyngeal arch segmentation and proximal PA defects are likely the basis for the abnormal morphogenesis in Eya1-/- embryos previously described (Xu et al., 1999). Eya1-/- specific phenotypes in the pharyngeal arch and epibranchial placode Eya1 and Six1 are both important for craniofacial morphogenesis (Xu et al., 1999; Laclef et al., 2003; Zou et al., 2006) and we first compared their expression patterns. At E8.5 and before the pharyngeal arch outgrowth, Eya1 was expressed broadly in the posterior placode and the pharyngeal region, including the pharyngeal ectoderm and pharyngeal pouch (Figure 2A and A’). At E9.5, Eya1 was restricted to the maxillary and most distal part of PA1, the proximal-rostral and caudal parts of PA2, and the posterior PA (Figure 2B and B’). Eya1 immunoreactivity was observed in both cytoplasm and nucleus in ectodermal cells (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A and A’). The expression pattern of Six1 was similar to Eya1 at E9.5 (Figure 2C), although Six1 expression also extended into the pharyngeal ectomesenchyme (Figure 2C’). Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all Download asset Open asset Differences in pharyngeal arch phenotypes in Eya1-/- and Six1-/- embryos. (A–C’) In situ hybridization on whole-mount and coronal sections of Eya1 and Six1 in WT embryos at E8.5 (n = 5) and E9.5 (n = 5). (D–I) Immunostaining for Sox2 and Sox3 on coronal sections of E9.5 WT, Eya1-/- and Six1-/- embryos. (J–R’) In situ hybridization of Sox2, Fgf3, and Spry1 on whole-mount and coronal sections of E9.5 embryos (n ≥ 5). (S–U’) In situ hybridization of Neurog2 on whole-mount and coronal sections through the region of the geniculate and petrosal placodes of E9.5 embryos (n = 5). (V) Schematic summary of the abnormal PA phenotype and gene expression patterns in WT, Eya1-/- and Six1-/- embryos. Light blue and light orange label the Brn1+ proximal and Dlx5+ distal PA regions, respectively. The black dotted circles demarcate the pharyngeal segmentation plates. Green, blue, and red indicate Sox2+ and Fgf3+, single Sox2+ and Neurog2+ expression regions, respectively. em, ectomesenchyme; g, geniculate placode; p, petrosal placode; n, nodose placodes. Arrowheads indicate rostral-proximal ectodermal cells of PA2. Scale bars, 100 µm. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30126.005 Sox3-/- and Fgfr1n7/n7 mutants display similar proximal pharyngeal arch phenotypes (Trokovic et al., 2003; Rizzoti and Lovell-Badge, 2007) and we therefore analyzed the expression of SoxB1 genes and Fgf signaling factors in Eya1-/- and Six1-/- E9.5 embryos. Analysis of Sox2, which is an early marker for cranial placodes (Wood and Episkopou, 1999), revealed expression in the rostral-proximal part of the pharyngeal ectoderm (Figure 2J and J’) and a reduction of Sox2 expression in both Six1 and Eya1 knockout embryos (Figure 2K and L). However, Sox2+ cells were still observed in the pharyngeal ectoderm in both mutants (Figure 2D–2F). In Eya1-/- embryos, Sox2+ cells were found in the residual proximal pharyngeal ectoderm, and the total number of Sox2+ cells in the mutant geniculate placode (139 ± 33, n = 3) was significantly reduced compared with wildtype (286 ± 26, n = 3). Expression of Sox3, which also regulates pharyngeal segmentation and proximal PA2 development (Rizzoti and Lovell-Badge, 2007), was reduced in Eya1-/- (Figure 2H) but unaffected in Six1-/- ectoderm (Figure 2I). In wildtype and Six1-/- E9.5 embryos, Fgf3 expression was observed in the rostral-proximal pharyngeal ectoderm and endoderm (Figure 2M, M, O and O’). While Fgf3 expression in the pharyngeal endoderm was retained in the Eya1-/- embryos (Figure 2N’), Fgf3 expression was dramatically reduced in the Sox2+ epithelial cells (Figure 2N and N’). Fgf3 expression stems from Sox2+ cells (see below), and the fact that these cells were still present in the Eya1-/- embryos (Figure 2E) indicates that the reduction of Fgf3 expression is not due to the loss of the Fgf3-generating cells. Expression of Fgf15 and Fgf8 was also reduced in the Eya1-/- embryos, but unaffected in the Six1-/- embryos (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B–1G). In contrast, the expression of Fgfr1 was neither affected in the Eya1-/- nor in the Six1-/- embryos (Figure 2—figure supplement 1H–1J). We also examined the expression of Spry1 (Sprouty1), a downstream effector of Fgf signaling (Minowada et al., 1999). Spry1 expression in the ectoderm was specifically downregulated in Eya1-/- embryos but not in Six1-/- embryos (Figure 2P–2R’), indicating a reduced level of ectodermal Fgf signaling activity in Eya1-/- embryos. This is likely to stem from the Fgf ligand side, as the level of Fgfr1 was not affected in the mutant embryos (Figure 2—figure supplement 1H–1J). Pharyngeal arch segmentation occurred normally in the Six1-/- embryos (Figure 2F, I, L’, O’ and and R’), whereas it was severely compromised in the Eya1-/- embryos as described in Figure 1. Finally, epibranchial placodal cells in the Eya1-/- embryos did not express Neurog2 (Figure 2T and T’), while Neurog2 expression was still observed in the petrosal and nodose placodes in the Six1-/- embryos (Figure 2U and U’). This result verified previous findings that epibranchial placode neurogenesis was affected in both mutants, but more severely in the Eya1-/- embryos (Zou et al., 2004). In sum, the Eya1-/- and Six1-/- embryos differ in some important regards (Figure 2V). In the Eya1-/- embryos, there are pharyngeal arch segmentation defects, loss of proximal arches accompanied by loss of ectodermal Fgf3 and Neurog2 expression. Conversely, in the Six1-/- embryos, the Sox2+ cells are specified and patterned in the right position and able to produce near normal levels of Fgf3. While it is possible that other Six genes such as Six2/4 may compensate for the absence of Six1, collectively, the data suggest that Eya1 is specifically required to regulate the formation of PA and epibranchial placodes. Bipotential epibranchial placode differentiation To gain insights into the cellular origin of the Eya1-/- specific phenotypes, we analyzed Sox2, Fgf3 and Neurog2 expression during epibranchial placode and PA development. The expression patterns and morphological transitions are summarized in Figure 3 and Figure 3—figure supplement 1. To obtain a more high-resolution view of the gene expression patterns, we examined the expression of Eya1, Sox2, Neurog2 and Fgf3 on transverse sections from E8.0 (5 somites) to E9.5 (25 somites) wildtype embryos at the position of the epibranchial or geniculate placodes. At E8.0 (5ss), the thickened placodal ectoderm was Sox2+ and none of the cells was Fgf3+ or Neurog2+ (Figure 3A and F–G’). At E8.5 (8ss), Neurog2 and Fgf3 expression started to emerge in the Sox2+ placodal ectoderm (Figure 3B and I–J’). Co-staining for Sox2 and Neurog2 showed a salt-and-pepper expression distribution at 15ss (Figure 3L) and three types of expression patterns could be discerned: Sox2 single positive, Neurog2 single positive, and Sox2/Neurog2 double positive cells. Fgf3 expression could also be detected in the Sox2+ cell population (Figure 3C and M–M’). At 8-15ss, there were Fgf3/Sox2 double positive cells in the Neurog2 positive region (Figure 3I–3J’ and and L–M’). Interestingly, at E9.5 (25ss), all Neurog2+ cells were sorted to the proximal region while the Sox2+/Fgf3+ cells were confined to the more distal region on the lateral surface of the PA (Figure 3O–3P'). Eya1 was co-expressed with Sox2 from 5ss onwards and was expressed in both the Neurog2+ and Fgf3+ regions from 8 to 25ss (Figure 3E, H, K and N). Since the Fgf3+/Sox2+/Neurog2- cells also exhibited a thickened epithelial morphology and expressed Eya1, we propose that these cells define a new non-neuronal cell lineage in the epibranchial placode. In Eya1-/- embryos, Neurog2 expression was lost while Sox2 expression was still retained in the epithelium from E8.0 to E9.5 (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A–1D’). Therefore, while the Neurog2+ neurogenic placodal cells were lost, the Sox2+ cells in the non-neuronal lineage remained in the Eya1-/- embryos (depicted in Figure 3—figure supplement 1E). Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all Download asset Open asset Bipotential Sox2+ progenitors give rise to both neurogenic and non-neuronal epibranchial placodal cells. (A–D) Sox2, Fgf3 and Neurog2 expression in whole-mount WT embryos at E8.0, E8.5, E8.75 and E9.5. At E8.0, the pharyngeal surface ectoderm was induced to form the thickened posterior placode, which expressed Sox2 but not Fgf3 or Neurog2 (A). At E8.5, the first PA became morphologically identifiable and the pharyngeal ectoderm began to make contact with the endoderm. Fgf3 and Neurog2 expression could be detected in the epibranchial placode (B). At E8.75, the first pharyngeal cleft was already visible on the lateral side of the embryo, just rostral to the group of Sox2+cells, and Fgf3 and Neurog2 expression expanded ventrally and dorsally, respectively (C). At E9.5, the Sox2 and Fgf3 signals became more condensed and restricted to the rostral-proximal PA, while the Neurog2 expression expanded more dorsally in each PA (D), and the separation of the Sox2+/Fgf3+ and Neurog2+ cells became clear. Arrows indicate Sox2-expressing epibranchial placodal regions (n ≥ 5 for each stage). Black dashed lines indicate the position of foregut dorsal endoderm. (E–P’) Immunostaining for Eya1 (E, H, K and N) and co-immunostaining of Neurog2 and Sox2 (F, I, L and O) on adjacent transverse sections; and co-staining of Sox2 and in situ hybridization of Fgf3 (G, J, M and P) on transverse sections of WT embryos at different somite stages (ss) as indicated. Arrowheads indicate Neurog2+/Sox2+ double positive cells (n ≥ 4 per stage). (Q–S) Lineage tracing of Sox2+ placodal cells in Sox2-Cre; R26REYFP embryos. Tamoxifen was injected at E7.5 and embryos examined by whole-mount EYFP fluorescence at E9.5 (n = 10) (arrowheads indicate EYFP+ placodal regions) (Q). Co-immunostaining for Islet1/EYFP and Sox2/EYFP revealed the neurogenic lineage (n = 6) (R) and non-neuronal lineages (n = 4) (S). Arrow indicates Islet1+/EYFP+ positive cell. (T) Schematic diagram illustrating the coronal (blue; S) and transverse (pink; E–P’ and R) planes of sections for the respective panels in this figure. (U) Schematic diagram summarizing the differentiation of Sox2+ epibranchial placode progenitors (blue) into Neurog2+ neurogenic placodal cells and delaminating neurons (red); and Sox2+/Fgf3+ placodal cells (green). Scale bars, 100 µm. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30126.007 We next asked whether the Neurog2+ cells that delaminate to form neurons in the cranial ganglia and the Fgf3+/Sox2+/Neurog2- cells were lineage-related. To address this, we used a Sox2 cell lineage tracing system (Sox2-CreER; R26REYFP mice) in which tamoxifen induction at E7.5 would label the Sox2-expressing cells after this stage. Analysis of tamoxifen-injected embryos two days later, at E9.5 (Figure 3Q), revealed that some EYFP-expressing cells were also positive for Islet1, a marker for delaminating neurons (Figure 3R), suggesting that the Sox2+ lineage gave rise to neuronal progeny destined for the geniculate ganglion. We however also observed EYFP-expression in cells with thickened epithelial morphology, which expressed Sox2 and also gave rise to the pharyngeal cleft, and proximal pharyngeal ectoderm cells (Figure 3—figure supplement 3S). This indicates that cells expressing Sox2 at E7.5 segregated to delaminating neurons as well as to cells in the non-neurogenic lineage. In conclusion, these data provide evidence for a novel type of lineage that ‘lives on’ in the epibranchial placode after delamination of neuronal cells, and continues to express Sox2, Fgf3 and other factors. By injection of tamoxifen at E9.5 and analysis at E12.5 and E14.5, we detected EYFP expression in the external auditory canal and pinna epithelium, indicating that non-neuronal cells were produced (Figure 3—figure supplement 1H and I). The segregation of Sox2, Neurog2 and Fgf3 expression from E8.0–9.5 leading to the genesis of delaminating neuroblasts and the non-neuronal lineage are schematically depicted in Figure 3U. Notch signaling is reduced in the pharyngeal epithelium of Eya1-/- embryos The Notch signaling pathway is a key regulator of the neurogenesis of cranial placodes and cell fate specification (Hartman et al., 2010; Lassiter et al., 2014). We first analyzed the distribution of components of the Notch pathway and downstream target genes in wildtype embryos. The pharyngeal ectoderm showed extensive co-expression of Notch1 with Eya1 (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A–1A’’) and Sox2 from E8.0 onwards (Figure 4—figure supplement 1O and Q). Notch immunoreactivity was observed also in the nuclei, indicating active Notch signaling, a notion further supported by expression of Hey1, a Notch downstream target, at the pharyngeal ectoderm, with a distribution similar to that of Sox2 from E8.5 to E9.5 (Figure 4—figure supplement 1B–1E). In contrast, the expression domain of the Notch ligand Delta-like1 (Dll1) was found to overlap with that of Neurog2 from E8.5 to E9.5 (Figure 4—figure supplement 1F–1I). The expression domain of the Jag1 (Jagged1) ligand was broader, extended across both the Neurog2+ and Fgf3+ regions (Figure 4—figure supplement 1J–M). In sum, this indicates that Notch signaling pathway is involved in the specification of both the neurogenic and non-neuronal epibranchial domains. We next assessed whether Notch signaling was altered in Eya1-/- E9.5 embryos. To identify activated Notch signaling, we used an antibody that specifically recognizes the nascent N-terminus (V1744) formed on Notch1 ICD after γ-secretase cleavage. In wildtype embryos, V1744 immunoreactivity was observed in the ectodermal and endodermal cells as well as in the neural crest (Figure 4A and A’), whereas the ectodermal staining was specifically lost in the Eya1-/- embryos (Figure 4B and B’). This result may indicate that Notch1 is not proteolytically activated or that there is a reduction in the total amount of receptor. To distinguish between these two possibilities, we used an antibody (C20) that recognizes an epitope internally in the Notch1 ICD and thus monitors total amount of Notch1. The C20 immunoreactivity revealed a specific reduction of Notch1 immunoreactivity in the rostral-proximal ectodermal cells (Figure 4D and D’) as compared to wildtype (Figure 4C and C’), suggesting that the total amount of Notch1 receptor was reduced in the ectodermal cells rather than that receptor cleavage was affected. By in situ hybridization, we found that Notch1 mRNA was expressed in the ectodermal cells at E8.5 (8ss) (Figure 4—figure supplement 1S and T) and E9.5 (Figure 4—figure supplement 1U and V), while the protein expression of Notch1 was reduced from around 8ss in the Sox2+ placodal progenitors (Figure 4—figure supplement 1O–1R’), indicating post-transcriptional regulation of Notch1 in Eya1-/- embryos. The Notch3 receptor, which was also expressed in the pharyngeal ectoderm, was not affected in the Eya1-/- embryos (Figure 4—figure supplement 1X’). In wildtype embryos, Jag1 was expressed at high level at the PA segmental plate contact points and at a lower level in the rostral-proximal ectoderm, similar expression pattern was found in Eya1-/- embryos despite the absence of PA segmental plates (Figure 4E and F). On the other hand, Dll1 expression was lost in the epibranchial placode region in Eya1-/- embryos (Figure 4G and H). The downregulation of total amount of Notch1 protein was confirmed by Western blot analysis of dissected pharyngeal regions from E9.5 Eya1-/- embryos, and Eya1 protein levels were as expected non-detectable (Figure 4M). In keeping with reduced Notch1 receptor levels, expression of Hey1 was significantly downregulated in the ectoderm in the Eya1-/- E9.5 embryos (Figure 4I and J). Expression of Hes1, however, was much less affected (Figure 4K and L), which is consistent with that substantial Hes1 expression was observed in RBPJ-/- embryos (de la Pompa et al., 1997), suggesting that Hes1 is also regulated by other factors. Taken together, the results indicate that Eya1 is required for maintaining a normal level of Notch1 protein and for controlling the Notch signaling level in the ectodermal epithelium of PA2. Figure 4 with 2 supplements see all Download asset Open asset Downregulated Notch signaling in the ectoderm-derived pharyngeal epithelium of Eya1-/- embryos. (A–D and A’–D’) Immunostaining for Notch1 ICD by V1744, which specifically recognizes Notch1 ICD (A–B’); or by C20, which recognizes an internal epitope on Notch1 ICD and thus both cleaved and uncleaved Notch1 receptor (C–D’) on coronal sections of WT and Eya1-/- embryos at E9.5 (n = 4). Arrowheads indicate the rostral-proximal pharyngeal ectoderm in (A-D), which are magnified in (A’-D’). (E–L) Immunostaining for Jag1 (E, F) and in situ hybridization of Dll1, Hey1 and Hes1 (G–L) on whole-mount or coronal sections of WT and Eya1-/- embryos at
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
-
Chromatin Remodelers Interact with Eya1 and Six2 to Target Enhancers to Control Nephron Progenitor Cell Maintenance.
Jun Li,Jinshu Xu,Huihui Jiang,Ting Zhang,Aarthi Ramakrishnan,Li Shen,Pin-Xian Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2021040525
IF: 14.978
2021-01-01
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Abstract:Significance Statement Understanding how the precise gene expression states that define nephron progenitor cell identity are established and maintained is crucial for developing approaches to repair or regenerate the damaged nephron. Combination of Eya1-Six1/2 has been explored in inducing nephron progenitor–like cell reprogramming. This study uncovers a critical role for chromatin-remodeling SWI/SNF complex through interactions with Eya1-Six2 in nephron fate induction and maintenance and identifies critical factors, including Pbx1, as direct targets of SWI/SNF and Eya1-Six2. The properties of chromatin remodelers as transcriptional coregulators and Pbx1 in hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal suggest that they may be combined with Eya1-Six1/2 in reprogramming nephrons. Background Eya1 is a critical regulator of nephron progenitor cell specification and interacts with Six2 to promote NPC self-renewal. Haploinsufficiency of these genes causes kidney hypoplasia. However, how the Eya1-centered network operates remains unknown. Methods We engineered a 2×HA-3×Flag-Eya1 knock-in mouse line and performed coimmunoprecipitation with anti-HA or -Flag to precipitate the multitagged-Eya1 and its associated proteins. Loss-of-function, transcriptome profiling, and genome-wide binding analyses for Eya1's interacting chromatin-remodeling ATPase Brg1 were carried out. We assayed the activity of the cis-regulatory elements co-occupied by Brg1/Six2 in vivo. Results Eya1 and Six2 interact with the Brg1-based SWI/SNF complex during kidney development. Knockout of Brg1 results in failure of metanephric mesenchyme formation and depletion of nephron progenitors, which has been linked to loss of Eya1 expression. Transcriptional profiling shows conspicuous downregulation of important regulators for nephrogenesis in Brg1-deficient cells, including Lin28, Pbx1, and Dchs1-Fat4 signaling, but upregulation of podocyte lineage, oncogenic, and cell death–inducing genes, many of which Brg1 targets. Genome-wide binding analysis identifies Brg1 occupancy to a distal enhancer of Eya1 that drives nephron progenitor–specific expression. We demonstrate that Brg1 enrichment to two distal intronic enhancers of Pbx1 and a proximal promoter region of Mycn requires Six2 activity and that these Brg1/Six2-bound enhancers govern nephron progenitor–specific expression in response to Six2 activity. Conclusions Our results reveal an essential role for Brg1, its downstream pathways, and its interaction with Eya1-Six2 in mediating the fine balance among the self-renewal, differentiation, and survival of nephron progenitors.
-
An Eya1-Notch Axis Specifies Bipotential Epibranchial Differentiation in Mammalian Craniofacial Morphogenesis
Haoran Zhang,Li Wang,Elaine Yee Man Wong,Sze Lan Tsang,Pin-Xian Xu,Urban Lendahl,Mai Har Sham
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.30126
IF: 7.7
2017-01-01
eLife
Abstract:Craniofacial morphogenesis requires proper development of pharyngeal arches and epibranchial placodes. We show that the epibranchial placodes, in addition to giving rise to cranial sensory neurons, generate a novel lineage-related non-neuronal cell population for mouse pharyngeal arch development. Eya1 is essential for the development of epibranchial placodes and proximal pharyngeal arches. We identify an Eya1-Notch regulatory axis that specifies both the neuronal and non-neuronal commitment of the epibranchial placode, where Notch acts downstream of Eya1 and promotes the non-neuronal cell fate. Notch is regulated by the threonine phosphatase activity of Eya1. Eya1 dephosphorylates p-threonine-2122 of the Notch1 intracellular domain (Notch1 ICD), which increases the stability of Notch1 ICD and maintains Notch signaling activity in the non-neuronal epibranchial placodal cells. Our data unveil a more complex differentiation program in epibranchial placodes and an important role for the Eya1-Notch axis in craniofacial morphogenesis.
-
The Transcriptional Coactivator Eya1 Exerts Transcriptional Repressive Activity by Interacting with REST Corepressors and REST-binding Sequences to Maintain Nephron Progenitor Identity
Jun Li,Chunming Cheng,Jinshu Xu,Ting Zhang,Bengu Tokat,Georgia Dolios,Aarthi Ramakrishnan,Li Shen,Rong Wang,Pin-Xian Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac760
IF: 14.9
2022-01-01
Nucleic Acids Research
Abstract:Eya1 is critical for establishing and maintaining nephron progenitor cells (NPCs). It belongs to a family of proteins called phosphatase-transcriptional activators but without intrinsic DNA-binding activity. However, the spectrum of the Eya1-centered networks is underexplored. Here, we combined transcriptomic, genomic and proteomic approaches to characterize gene regulation by Eya1 in the NPCs. We identified Eya1 target genes, associated cis-regulatory elements and partner proteins. Eya1 preferentially occupies promoter sequences and interacts with general transcription factors (TFs), RNA polymerases, different types of TFs, chromatin-remodeling factors with ATPase or helicase activity, and DNA replication/repair proteins. Intriguingly, we identified REST-binding motifs in 76% of Eya1-occupied sites without H3K27ac-deposition, which were present in many Eya1 target genes upregulated in Eya1-deficient NPCs. Eya1 copurified REST-interacting chromatin-remodeling factors, histone deacetylase/lysine demethylase, and corepressors. Coimmunoprecipitation validated physical interaction between Eya1 and Rest/Hdac1/Cdyl/Hltf in the kidneys. Collectively, our results suggest that through interactions with chromatin-remodeling factors and specialized DNA-binding proteins, Eya1 may modify chromatin structure to facilitate the assembly of regulatory complexes that regulate transcription positively or negatively. These findings provide a mechanistic basis for how Eya1 exerts its activity by forming unique multiprotein complexes in various biological processes to maintain the cellular state of NPCs.
-
Wnt5a and Wnt11 Regulate Mammalian Anterior-Posterior Axis Elongation
Philipp Andre,Hai Song,Wantae Kim,Andreas Kispert,Yingzi Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.119065
IF: 6.8622
2015-01-01
Development
Abstract:Mesoderm formation and subsequent anterior-posterior (A-P) axis elongation are fundamental aspects of gastrulation, which is initiated by formation of the primitive streak (PS). Convergent extension (CE) movements and epithelial-mesenchymal transition(EMT) are important for A-P axis elongation in vertebrate embryos. The evolutionarily conserved planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway regulates CE, and Wnts regulate many aspects of gastrulation including CE and EMT. However, the Wnt ligands that regulate A-P axis elongation in mammalian development remain unknown. Wnt11 and Wnt5a regulate axis elongation in lower vertebrates, but only Wnt5a, not Wnt11, regulates mammalian PCP signaling and A-P axis elongation in development. Here, by generating Wnt5a; Wnt11 compound mutants, we show that Wnt11 and Wnt5a play redundant roles during mouse A-P axis elongation. Both genes regulate trunk notochord extension through PCP-controlled CE of notochord cells, establishing a role for Wnt11 in mammalian PCP. We show that Wnt5a and Wnt11 are required for proper patterning of the neural tube and somites by regulating notochord formation, and provide evidence that both genes are required for the generation and migration of axial and paraxial mesodermal precursor cells by regulating EMT. Axial and paraxial mesodermal precursors ectopically accumulate in the PS at late gastrula stages in Wnt5a(-/-); Wnt11(-/-) embryos and these cells ectopically express epithelial cell adhesion molecules. Our data suggest that Wnt5a and Wnt11 regulate EMT by inducing p38 (Mapk14) phosphorylation. Our findings provide new insights into the role of Wnt5a and Wnt11 in mouse early development and also in cancer metastasis, during which EMT plays a crucial role.
-
Brg1 controls neurosensory cell fate commitment and differentiation in the mammalian inner ear
Pin-Xian Xu,Jinshu Xu,Jun Li,Yong-Hwee Eddie Loh,Ting Zhang,Huihui Jiang,Bernd Fritzsch,Aarthi Ramakrishnan,Li Shen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/434159
2018-01-01
bioRxiv
Abstract:Otic ectoderm gives rise to almost all cell types of the inner ear; however, the mechanisms that link transcription factors, chromatin, lineage commitment and differentiation capacity are largely unknown. Here we show that Brg1 chromatin-remodeling factor is required for specifying neurosensory lineage in the otocyst and for inducing hair and supporting cell fates in the cochlear sensory epithelium. Brg1 interacts with the critical neurosensory-specific transcription factors Eya1/Six1, both of which simultaneously interact with BAF60a or BAF60c. Chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) and ChIP assays demonstrate Brg1 association with discrete regulatory elements at the Eya1 and Six1 loci. Brg1 -deficiency leads to markedly decreased Brg1 binding at these elements and loss of Eya1 and Six1 expression. Furthermore, ChIP-seq reveals Brg1-bound promoter-proximal and distal regions near genes essential for inner ear morphogenesis and cochlear sensory epithelium development. These findings uncover essential functions for chromatin-remodeling in the activation of neurosensory fates during inner ear development.
-
Transcriptional regulatory networks in epiblast cells and during anterior neural plate development as modeled in epiblast stem cells
Makiko Iwafuchi-Doi,Kazunari Matsuda,Kazuhiro Murakami,Hitoshi Niwa,Paul J. Tesar,Jun Aruga,Isao Matsuo,Hisato Kondoh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.085936
IF: 6.8622
2012-11-01
Development
Abstract:Somatic development initiates from the epiblast in post-implantation mammalian embryos. Recent establishment of epiblast stem cell (EpiSC) lines has opened up new avenues of investigation of the mechanisms that regulate the epiblast state and initiate lineage-specific somatic development. Here, we investigated the role of cell-intrinsic core transcriptional regulation in the epiblast and during derivation of the anterior neural plate (ANP) using a mouse EpiSC model. Cells that developed from EpiSCs in one day in the absence of extrinsic signals were found to represent the ANP of ~E7.5 embryos. We focused on transcription factors that are uniformly expressed in the E6.5 epiblast but in a localized fashion within or external to the ANP at E7.5, as these are likely to regulate the epiblast state and ANP development depending on their balance. Analyses of the effects of knockdown and overexpression of these factors in EpiSCs on the levels of downstream transcription factors identified the following regulatory functions: cross-regulation among Zic, Otx2, Sox2 and Pou factors stabilizes the epiblastic state; Zic, Otx2 and Pou factors in combination repress mesodermal development; Zic and Sox2 factors repress endodermal development; and Otx2 represses posterior neural plate development. All of these factors variably activate genes responsible for neural plate development. The direct interaction of these factors with enhancers of Otx2, Hesx1 and Sox2 genes was demonstrated. Thus, a combination of regulatory processes that suppresses non-ANP lineages and promotes neural plate development determines the ANP.
developmental biology
-
Notch signalling regulates epibranchial placode patterning and segregation.
Li Wang,Junjie Xie,Haoran Zhang,Long Hin Tsang,Sze Lan Tsang,Eike-Benjamin Braune,Urban Lendahl,Mai Har Sham
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.183665
IF: 6.8622
2020-01-01
Development
Abstract:Epibranchial placodes are the geniculate, petrosal and nodose placodes that generate parts of cranial nerves VII, IX and X, respectively. How the three spatially separated placodes are derived from the common posterior placodal area is poorly understood. Here, we reveal that the broad posterior placode area is first patterned into a Vgll2(+)/lrx5(+) rostral domain and a Sox2(+)/Fgf3(+)/Etv5(+) caudal domain relative to the first pharyngeal deft. This initial rostral and caudal patterning is then sequentially repeated along each pharyngeal cleft for each epibranchial placode. The caudal domains give rise to the neuronal and non-neuronal cells in the placode, whereas the rostral domains are previously unrecognized structures, serving as spacers between the final placodes. Notch signalling regulates the balance between the rostral and caudal domains: high levels of Notch signalling expand the caudal domain at the expense of the rostral domain, whereas loss of Notch signalling produces the converse phenotype. Collectively, these data unravel a new patterning principle for the early phases of epibranchial placode development and a role for Notch signalling in orchestrating epibranchial placode segregation and differentiation.
-
Hoxb3 Regulates Jag1 Expression in Pharyngeal Epithelium and Affects Interaction With Neural Crest Cells
Haoran Zhang,Junjie Xie,Karl Kam Hei So,Ka Kui Tong,Jearn Jang Sae-Pang,Li Wang,Sze Lan Tsang,Wood Yee Chan,Elaine Yee Man Wong,Mai Har Sham
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.612230
IF: 4
2021-01-11
Frontiers in Physiology
Abstract:Craniofacial morphogenesis depends on proper migration of neural crest cells and their interactions with placodes and other cell types. Hox genes provide positional information and are important in patterning the neural crest and pharyngeal arches (PAs) for coordinated formation of craniofacial structures. Hox genes are expressed in the surface ectoderm and epibranchial placodes, their roles in the pharyngeal epithelium and their downstream targets in regulating PA morphogenesis have not been established. We altered the Hox code in the pharyngeal region of the Hoxb3 Tg /+ mutant, in which Hoxb3 is driven to ectopically expressed in Hoxb2 domain in the second pharyngeal arch (PA2). In the transgenic mutant, ectopic Hoxb3 expression was restricted to the surface ectoderm, including the proximal epibranchial placodal region and the distal pharyngeal epithelium. The Hoxb3 Tg /+ mutants displayed hypoplasia of PA2, multiple neural crest-derived facial skeletal and nerve defects. Interestingly, we found that in the Hoxb3 Tg /+ mutant, expression of the Notch ligand Jag1 was specifically up-regulated in the ectodermal pharyngeal epithelial cells of PA2. By molecular experiments, we demonstrated that Hoxb3 could bind to an upstream genomic site S2 and directly regulate Jag1 expression. In the Hoxb3 Tg/+ mutant, elevated expression of Jag1 in the pharyngeal epithelium led to abnormal cellular interaction and deficiency of neural crest cells migrating into PA2. In summary, we showed that Hoxb3 regulates Jag1 expression and proposed a model of pharyngeal epithelium and neural crest interaction during pharyngeal arch development.
physiology
-
A gene regulatory network underlying the formation of pre-placodal ectoderm in Xenopus laevis
Santosh Kumar Maharana,Gerhard Schlosser
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-018-0540-5
IF: 7.364
2018-07-16
BMC Biology
Abstract:BackgroundThe neural plate border ectoderm gives rise to key developmental structures during embryogenesis, including the neural crest and the preplacodal ectoderm. Many sensory organs and ganglia of vertebrates develop from cranial placodes, which themselves arise from preplacodal ectoderm, defined by expression of transcription factor Six1 and its coactivator Eya1. Here we elucidate the gene regulatory network underlying the specification of the preplacodal ectoderm in Xenopus, and the functional interactions among transcription factors that give rise to this structure.ResultsTo elucidate the gene regulatory network upstream of preplacodal ectoderm formation, we use gain- and loss-of-function studies to explore the role of early ectodermal transcription factors for establishing the preplacodal ectoderm and adjacent ectodermal territories, and the role of Six1 and Eya1 in feedback regulation of these transcription factors. Our findings suggest that transcription factors with expression restricted to ventral (non-neural) ectoderm (AP2, Msx1, FoxI1, Vent2, Dlx3, GATA2) and those restricted to dorsal (neural) ectoderm (Pax3, Hairy2b, Zic1) are required for specification of both preplacodal ectoderm and neural crest in a context-dependent fashion and are cross-regulated by Eya1 and Six1.ConclusionThese findings allow us to elucidate a detailed gene regulatory network at the neural plate border upstream of preplacodal ectoderm formation based on functional interactions between ectodermal transcription factors. We propose a new model to explain the formation of immediately juxtaposed preplacodal ectoderm and neural crest territories at the neural plate border, uniting previous models.
biology
-
AP-2α and AP-2β cooperatively function in the craniofacial surface ectoderm to regulate chromatin and gene expression dynamics during facial development
Eric Van Otterloo,Isaac Milanda,Hamish Pike,Hong Li,Kenneth L Jones,Trevor Williams
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.10.447717
2021-06-10
Abstract:ABSTRACT The facial surface ectoderm is essential for normal development of the underlying cranial neural crest cell populations, providing signals that direct appropriate growth, patterning, and morphogenesis. Despite the importance of the ectoderm as a signaling center, the molecular cues and genetic programs implemented within this tissue are understudied. Here we show that removal of two members of the AP-2 transcription factor family, AP-2α and AP-2ß, within the early embryonic ectoderm leads to major alterations in the mouse craniofacial complex. Significantly, there are clefts in both the upper face and mandible, accompanied by fusion of the upper and lower jaws in the hinge region. Comparison of ATAC-seq and RNA-seq analyses between controls and mutants revealed significant changes in chromatin accessibility and gene expression centered on multiple AP-2 binding motifs associated with enhancer elements within these ectodermal lineages. In particular, loss of these AP-2 proteins affects both skin differentiation as well as multiple signaling pathways, most notably the WNT pathway. The role of reduced Wnt signaling throughput in the mutant phenotype was further confirmed using reporter assays and rescue experiments involving Wnt1 ligand overexpression. Collectively, these findings highlight a conserved ancestral function for AP-2 transcription factors in ectodermal development and signaling, and provide a framework from which to understand the gene regulatory network operating within this tissue that directs vertebrate craniofacial development.
-
Crucial and Overlapping Roles of Six1 and Six2 in Craniofacial Development.
Z Liu,C Li,J Xu,Y Lan,H Liu,X Li,P Maire,X Wang,R Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034519835204
2019-01-01
Journal of Dental Research
Abstract:SIX1 and SIX2 encode closely related transcription factors of which disruptions have been associated with distinct craniofacial syndromes, with mutations in SIX1 associated with branchiootic syndrome 3 (BOS3) and heterozygous deletions of SIX2 associated with frontonasal dysplasia defects. Whereas mice deficient in Six1 recapitulated most of the developmental defects associated with BOS3, mice lacking Six2 function had no obvious frontonasal defects. We show that Six1 and Six2 exhibit partly overlapping patterns of expression in the developing mouse embryonic frontonasal, maxillary, and mandibular processes. We found that Six1 -/- Six2 -/- double-mutant mice were born with severe craniofacial deformity not seen in the Six1 -/- or Six2 -/- single mutants, including skull bone agenesis, midline facial cleft, and syngnathia. Moreover, whereas Six1 -/- mice exhibited partial transformation of maxillary zygomatic bone into a mandibular condyle-like structure, Six1 -/-Six2 +/- mice exhibit significantly increased penetrance of the maxillary malformation. In addition to ectopic Dlx5 expression at the maxillary-mandibular junction as recently reported in E10.5 Six1 -/- embryos, the E10.5 Six1 -/- Six2 +/- embryos showed ectopic expression of Bmp4, Msx1, and Msx2 messenger RNAs in the maxillary-mandibular junction. Genetically inactivating 1 allele of either Ednra or Bmp4 significantly reduced the penetrance of maxillary malformation in both Six1 -/- and Six1 -/- Six2 +/- embryos, indicating that Six1 and Six2 regulate both endothelin and bone morphogenetic protein-4 signaling pathways to pattern the facial structures. Furthermore, we show that neural crest-specific inactivation of Six1 in Six2 -/- embryos resulted in midline facial cleft and frontal bone agenesis. We show that Six1 -/- Six2 -/- embryos exhibit significantly reduced expression of key frontonasal development genes Alx1 and Alx3 as well as increased apoptosis in the developing frontonasal mesenchyme. Together, these results indicate that Six1 and Six2 function partly redundantly to control multiple craniofacial developmental processes and play a crucial neural crest cell-autonomous role in frontonasal morphogenesis.
-
Transcriptomic analysis reveals the role of SIX1 in mouse cranial neural crest patterning and bone development
Aparna Baxi,Karyn Jourdeuil,Timothy C Cox,David E Clouthier,Andre L P Tavares
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.597
Abstract:Background: Genetic variants of the transcription factor SIX1 and its co-factor EYA1 underlie 50% of Branchio-oto-renal syndrome (BOR) cases. BOR is characterized by craniofacial defects, including malformed middle ear ossicles leading to conductive hearing loss. In this work, we expand our knowledge of the Six1 gene regulatory network by using a Six1-null mouse line to assess gene expression profiles of E10.5 mandibular arches, which give rise to the neural crest (NC)-derived middle ear ossicles and lower jaw, via bulk RNA sequencing. Results: Our transcriptomic analysis led to the identification of 808 differentially expressed genes that are related to translation, NC cell differentiation, osteogenesis, and chondrogenesis including components of the WNT signaling pathway. As WNT signaling is a known contributor to bone development, we demonstrated that SIX1 is required for expression of the WNT antagonist Frzb in the mandibular arch, and determined that SIX1 expression results in repression of WNT signaling. Conclusion: Our results clarify the mechanisms by which SIX1 regulates the development of NC-derived craniofacial elements that are altered in SIX1-associated disorders. In addition, this work identifies novel genes that could be causative to this birth defect and establishes a link between SIX1 and WNT signaling during patterning of NC cells.
-
The role of Six1 in mammalian auditory system development
Weiming Zheng,Li Huang,Zhu-Bo Wei,Derek Silvius,Bihui Tang,Pin-Xian Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00628
IF: 6.8622
2003-09-01
Development
Abstract:The homeobox Six genes, homologues to Drosophila sine oculis(so) gene, are expressed in multiple organs during mammalian development. However, their roles during auditory system development have not been studied. We report that Six1 is required for mouse auditory system development. During inner ear development, Six1 expression was first detected in the ventral region of the otic pit and later is restricted to the middle and ventral otic vesicle within which, respectively, the vestibular and auditory epithelia form. By contrast, Six1 expression is excluded from the dorsal otic vesicle within which the semicircular canals form. Six1 is also expressed in the vestibuloacoustic ganglion. At E15.5, Six1 is expressed in all sensory epithelia of the inner ear. Using recently generated Six1 mutant mice, we found that all Six1+/- mice showed some degree of hearing loss because of a failure of sound transmission in the middle ear. By contrast, Six1-/- mice displayed malformations of the auditory system involving the outer, middle and inner ears. The inner ear development in Six1-/- embryos arrested at the otic vesicle stage and all components of the inner ear failed to form due to increased cell death and reduced cell proliferation in the otic epithelium. Because we previously reported that Six1 expression in the otic vesicle is Eya1dependent, we first clarified that Eya1 expression was unaffected in Six1-/- otic vesicle, further demonstrating that the Drosophila Eya-Six regulatory cassette is evolutionarily conserved during mammalian inner ear development. We also analyzed several other otic markers and found that the expression of Pax2 and Pax8 was unaffected in Six1-/- otic vesicle. By contrast, Six1 is required for the activation of Fgf3 expression and the maintenance of Fgf10 and Bmp4 expression in the otic vesicle. Furthermore, loss of Six1 function alters the expression pattern of Nkx5.1 and Gata3, indicating that Six1is required for regional specification of the otic vesicle. Finally, our data suggest that the interaction between Eya1 and Six1 is crucial for the morphogenesis of the cochlea and the posterior ampulla during inner ear development. These analyses establish a role for Six1 in early growth and patterning of the otic vesicle.
developmental biology
-
Egfl6 is Involved in Zebrafish Notochord Development
Xueqian Wang,Xin Wang,Wei Yuan,Renjie Chai,Dong Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-015-0061-x
2015-01-01
Fish Physiology and Biochemistry
Abstract:The epidermal growth factor (EGF) repeat motif defines a superfamily of diverse protein involved in regulating a variety of cellular and physiological processes, such as cell cycle, cell adhesion, proliferation, migration, and neural development. Egfl6, an EGF protein, also named MAGE was first cloned in human tissue. Up to date, the study of zebrafish Egfl6 expression pattern and functional analysis of Egfl6 involved in embryonic development of vertebrate in vivo is thus far lacking. Here we reported that Egfl6 was involved in zebrafish notochord development. It was shown that Egfl6 mRNA was expressed in zebrafish, developing somites, fin epidermis, pharyngeal arches, and hindbrain region. Particularly the secreted Egfl6 protein was significantly accumulated in notochord. Loss of Egfl6 function in zebrafish embryos resulted in curved body with distorted notochord in the posterior trunk. It was observed that expression of all Notch ligand and receptors in notochord of 28 hpf Egfl6 morphants was not affected, except notch2, which was up-regulated. We found that inhibition of Notch signaling by DAPT efficiently rescued notochord developmental defect of Egfl6 deficiency embryos.
-
Ectomesenchymal Six1 Controls Mandibular Skeleton Formation.
Songyuan Luo,Zhixu Liu,Qian Bian,Xudong Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1082911
IF: 3.7
2023-01-01
Frontiers in Genetics
Abstract:Craniofacial development requires intricate cooperation between multiple transcription factors and signaling pathways. Six1 is a critical transcription factor regulating craniofacial development. However, the exact function of Six1 during craniofacial development remains elusive. In this study, we investigated the role of Six1 in mandible development using a Six1 knockout mouse model (Six1−/−) and a cranial neural crest-specific, Six1 conditional knockout mouse model (Six1f/f; Wnt1-Cre). The Six1−/− mice exhibited multiple craniofacial deformities, including severe microsomia, high-arched palate, and uvula deformity. Notably, the Six1f/f; Wnt1-Cre mice recapitulate the microsomia phenotype of Six1−/− mice, thus demonstrating that the expression of Six1 in ectomesenchyme is critical for mandible development. We further showed that the knockout of Six1 led to abnormal expression of osteogenic genes within the mandible. Moreover, the knockdown of Six1 in C3H10 T1/2 cells reduced their osteogenic capacity in vitro. Using RNA-seq, we showed that both the loss of Six1 in the E18.5 mandible and Six1 knockdown in C3H10 T1/2 led to the dysregulation of genes involved in embryonic skeletal development. In particular, we showed that Six1 binds to the promoter of Bmp4, Fat4, Fgf18, and Fgfr2, and promotes their transcription. Collectively, our results suggest that Six1 plays a critical role in regulating mandibular skeleton formation during mouse embryogenesis.
-
Chromatin remodelers and lineage-specific factors interact to target enhancers to establish proneurosensory fate within otic ectoderm
Jinshu Xu,Jun Li,Ting Zhang,Huihui Jiang,Aarthi Ramakrishnan,Bernd Fritzsch,Li Shen,Pin-Xian Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2025196118
IF: 11.1
2021-03-15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Abstract:Significance The mammalian inner ear uses sensory hair cells and neurons for both auditory and vestibular function. Precursor cells for hair cells and neurons are derived from Sox2 + proneurosensory progenitors specified in the otic ectoderm. Here, we demonstrate that the inner ear neurosensory-specific transcription factor Six1 and its coactivator Eya1 collaborate with chromatin remodelers to promote the initial specification of a proneurosensory-restricted progenitor cell from an ectodermal cell within the otic ectoderm by inducing Sox2 activation. This process is mediated through three distal 3′ Sox2 enhancers whose otic-restricted activity depends on Six1. Our findings have broad implications for understanding the architecture of genetic regulatory circuits that induce the initial events of otic neurosensory lineage establishment and maintenance.
multidisciplinary sciences
-
Eya Protein Phosphatase Activity Regulates Six1–Dach–Eya Transcriptional Effects in Mammalian Organogenesis
Xue Li,Kenneth A. Ohgi,Jie Zhang,Anna Krones,Kevin T. Bush,Christopher K. Glass,Sanjay K. Nigam,Aneel K. Aggarwal,Richard Maas,David W. Rose,Michael G. Rosenfeld
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02083
IF: 64.8
2003-01-01
Nature
Abstract:Nature 426, 247–254 (2003). In this Article, K. A. Ohgi's surname was misspelled. It is presented correctly here.
-
Six1 controls patterning of the mouse otic vesicle
Hidenori Ozaki,Kazuaki Nakamura,Jun-ichi Funahashi,Keiko Ikeda,Gen Yamada,Hisashi Tokano,Hiro-oki Okamura,Ken Kitamura,Shigeaki Muto,Hayato Kotaki,Katsuko Sudo,Reiko Horai,Yoichiro Iwakura,Kiyoshi Kawakami
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00943
IF: 6.8622
Development
Abstract:Six1 is a member of the Six family homeobox genes, which function as components of the Pax-Six-Eya-Dach gene network to control organ development. Six1 is expressed in otic vesicles, nasal epithelia, branchial arches/pouches, nephrogenic cords, somites and a limited set of ganglia. In this study, we established Six1-deficient mice and found that development of the inner ear, nose, thymus, kidney and skeletal muscle was severely affected. Six1-deficient embryos were devoid of inner ear structures, including cochlea and vestibule, while their endolymphatic sac was enlarged. The inner ear anomaly began at around E10.5 and Six1 was expressed in the ventral region of the otic vesicle in the wild-type embryos at this stage. In the otic vesicle of Six1-deficient embryos, expressions of Otx1, Otx2, Lfng and Fgf3, which were expressed ventrally in the wild-type otic vesicles, were abolished, while the expression domains of Dlx5, Hmx3, Dach1 and Dach2, which were expressed dorsally in the wild-type otic vesicles, expanded ventrally. Our results indicate that Six1 functions as a key regulator of otic vesicle patterning at early embryogenesis and controls the expression domains of downstream otic genes responsible for respective inner ear structures. In addition, cell proliferation was reduced and apoptotic cell death was enhanced in the ventral region of the otic vesicle, suggesting the involvement of Six1 in cell proliferation and survival. In spite of the similarity of otic phenotypes of Six1- and Shh-deficient mice, expressions of Six1 and Shh were mutually independent.
-
Myocyte enhancer factor 2D regulates ectoderm specification and adhesion properties of animal cap cells in the early Xenopus embryo
Sandra Katz Imberman,Alina Kolpakova,Aviad Keren,Eyal Bengal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.13331
Abstract:In Xenopus, animal cap (AC) cells give rise to ectoderm and its derivatives: epidermis and the central nervous system. Ectoderm has long been considered a default pathway of embryonic development, with cells that are not under the influence of vegetal Nodal signaling adopting an ectodermal program of gene expression. In the present study, we describe the involvement of the animally-localized maternal transcription factor myocyte enhancer factor (Mef) 2D in regulating the identity of AC cells. We find that Mef2D is required for the formation of both ectodermal lineages: neural and epidermis. Gain and loss of function experiments indicate that Mef2D regulates early gastrula expression of key ectodermal/epidermal genes in the animal region. Mef2D controls the activity of zygotic bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling known to dictate the epidermal differentiation program. Exogenous expression of Mef2D in vegetal blastomeres was sufficient to induce ectopic expression of ectoderm/epidermal genes in the vegetal half of the embryo, when Nodal signaling was inhibited. Depletion of Mef2D caused a loss of AC cell adhesion that was rescued by the expression of E-cadherin or bone morphogenetic protein 4. In addition, expression of Mef2D in the prospective endoderm caused unusual aggregation of vegetal cells with animal cells in vitro and inappropriate segregation to other germ layers in vivo. Mef2D cooperates with another animally-expressed transcription factor, FoxI1e. Together, they regulate the expression of genes encoding signaling proteins and the transcription factors that control the regional identity of animal cells. Therefore, we describe a new role for the animally-localized Mef2D protein in early ectoderm specification, which is similar to that of the vegetally-localized VegT in endoderm and mesoderm formation.
-
Otic Neurogenesis in Xenopus laevis: Proliferation, Differentiation, and the Role of Eya1
Suad Hamdan Almasoudi,Gerhard Schlosser
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2021.722374
2021-09-20
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
Abstract:Using immunostaining and confocal microscopy, we here provide the first detailed description of otic neurogenesis in Xenopus laevis . We show that the otic vesicle comprises a pseudostratified epithelium with apicobasal polarity (apical enrichment of Par3, aPKC, phosphorylated Myosin light chain, N-cadherin) and interkinetic nuclear migration (apical localization of mitotic, pH3-positive cells). A Sox3-immunopositive neurosensory area in the ventromedial otic vesicle gives rise to neuroblasts, which delaminate through breaches in the basal lamina between stages 26/27 and 39. Delaminated cells congregate to form the vestibulocochlear ganglion, whose peripheral cells continue to proliferate (as judged by EdU incorporation), while central cells differentiate into Islet1/2-immunopositive neurons from stage 29 on and send out neurites at stage 31. The central part of the neurosensory area retains Sox3 but stops proliferating from stage 33, forming the first sensory areas (utricular/saccular maculae). The phosphatase and transcriptional coactivator Eya1 has previously been shown to play a central role for otic neurogenesis but the underlying mechanism is poorly understood. Using an antibody specifically raised against Xenopus Eya1, we characterize the subcellular localization of Eya1 proteins, their levels of expression as well as their distribution in relation to progenitor and neuronal differentiation markers during otic neurogenesis. We show that Eya1 protein localizes to both nuclei and cytoplasm in the otic epithelium, with levels of nuclear Eya1 declining in differentiating (Islet1/2+) vestibulocochlear ganglion neurons and in the developing sensory areas. Morpholino-based knockdown of Eya1 leads to reduction of proliferating, Sox3- and Islet1/2-immunopositive cells, redistribution of cell polarity proteins and loss of N-cadherin suggesting that Eya1 is required for maintenance of epithelial cells with apicobasal polarity, progenitor proliferation and neuronal differentiation during otic neurogenesis.
neurosciences,anatomy & morphology