Novel Biomarker Combo is Better Than Donor Specific Antibody in Predicting Long-Term Renal Allograft Outcome.

Wenrong Huang,Jie Cai,P I Terasaki,Kimberly P. Briley,Carl E. Haisch,Paul Bolin,W. Kendrick,Samantha Kendrick,Clinton Roy Morgan,Robert C. Harland,Luca Rebellato
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-201407151-02250
2014-01-01
Transplantation
Abstract:Background: We report the predictive value of a proprietary panel of four rejection biomarker combo (BMC) and compare with DSA in predicting long-term renal allograft outcome. Materials and methods:A total of 310 consecutive patients who received a kidney transplant between 1999 and 2012 were enrolled in this study. Recipient sera were tested for HLA antibodies and BMC 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months post-transplant using Luminex. Graft survival analyses was performed and compared between different patient groups based on the positivity of DSA and BMC. Results:27% and 56% of all patients had detectable DSA and rejection biomarkers post-transplant respectively. DSA positive patients had a 10% lower 10-yr graft survival rate than patients without DSA. While BMC positive patients had a 25% lower 10-yr graft survival rate than patients without detectable BMC (Fig.1A). When DSA negative patients were divided into two groups based on the positivity of BMC, BMC positive patients had a 20% lower 10-yr graft survival rate compared to BMC negative patients (p<0.05). Similarly, when DSA positive patients were divided into two groups based on the positivity of BMC, BMC positive patients had a 30% lower 10-yr graft survival rate compared to BMC negative patients (p<0.01, Fig.1B). When both DSA and BMC testing results were considered, DSA and BMC double positive patients had the lowest and double negative patients had the highest graft survival rate. The survival rates for BMC alone and DSA alone positive group were in between (p<0.001, Fig.1C). Multivariate Cox models confirmed that BMC was an independent risk factor of graft failure with a higher hazard ratio than DSA (BMC=2.60 vs DSA=1.64). Conclusion:In conclusion, serum BMC is an independent predictor of graft failure. BMC was more significantly associated with graft failure than DSA. In combination with DSA, BMC better predicted graft outcome than DSA or BMC alone.Figure: No Caption available.Figure: No Caption available.Figure: No Caption available.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?