The Comparative Study on the Biocompatibility of Four Kinds of Scaffolds

Ming‐Hai Wang,Youhai Dong,Yang Hong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9030.2009.11.056
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the biocompatibility of NHAC,INHAC,HAC as well as CHA by co-culturing with BMSCs in vitro. Methods BMSCs (a density of 2×10~5 cells/ml) were separately co-cultured with four scaffolds in vitro. The cell viability was assayed by MTT assay, the activity of ALP was measured, and the morphological changes were observed under the scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results The activities of ALP in CHA,NHAC,INHAC,HAC,and control groups were 2. 207±0. 079,2.225±0.059,2.194±0.088,0.981±0.210, and 2.231±0.087, respectively. The BMSCs co-cultured with NHAC, INHAC and CHA could preserve normal proliferating speed, and activity of ALP showed no significant difference as compared with control group (P>0.05), but there was significant dif-ferent between HAC and control groups (P<0.01). SEM revealed the co-cultured BMSCs could prolifer-ate and grow well on the surface and in the holes of the NHAC, INHAC and CHA except for HAC. Conclu-sion NHAC,INHAC and CHA exert good biocompatibility and can be used as biomaterial in bone tissue engineering. Key words: Tissue engineering; Biocompatibility; Nano; BMSC
What problem does this paper attempt to address?