In Defense of (Certain) Pople-Type Basis Sets

John Herbert,Montgomery Gray,Paige Bowling
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-jz473
2024-01-22
Abstract:A recent study suggests that Gaussian basis sets in the 6-311G family are inappropriate for thermochemical calculations based on density functional theory, emphasizing the need for polarization functions but omitting tests of Pople basis sets containing a full complement thereof. Here, we point out that certain basis sets in the 6-311G category yield error statistics with respect to benchmark calculations that are comparable to def2-TZVP, at about half the cost. More elaborate Pople basis sets can rival the accuracy of def2-QZVPD at 5-10% of the cost. We also clarify the role of integral thresholds in achieving robust convergence in the presence of diffuse basis functions.
Chemistry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?