Geographic Variation in Egg Ejection Rate by Great Tits Across 2 Continents

Wei Liang,Anders Pape Møller,Bård G. Stokke,Canchao Yang,Petr Kovařík,Haitao Wang,Cheng‐Te Yao,Ping Ding,Xin Lü,Arne Moksnes,Eivin Røskaft,Tomáš Grim
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arw061
2016-01-01
Behavioral Ecology
Abstract:Hosts of brood parasites may vary geographically in their ability to resist parasitism. In contrast, geographic variation in defenses, such as egg rejection, is not expected to be present or vary geographically in unsuitable hosts. We examined spatial patterns of resistance in the great tit Parus major, a passerine that is a textbook example of an unsuitable host for brood parasites because of its hole-nesting habits. We experimentally tested for spatial variation in foreign egg rejection in 395 nests across latitudinal gradients in China (5 populations) and Europe (7 populations). In China, egg rejection rates were very high but showed a latitudinal gradient from 100% in the south to 52% in the north. In Europe, rejection rates were very low (on average only 4%) and did not vary latitudinally. The egg ejection rate patterns matched geographic patterns of parasitism risk with rejection probabilities decreasing with latitude (a surrogate measure of the diversity of brood parasites). The present study for the first time challenges the idea that hole-nesting birds did not evolve resistance mechanisms against brood parasites and highlights the importance of large-scale geographic comparisons in ecological research.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?