Abstract:For most of the time during the last two millennia, China was a dynastic empire ruled by an emperor with the assistance of a highly developed mandarinate of imperial organs. “Administrative law” in the modern sense of a set of legal norms enacted by the legislature or developed by the judiciary that simultaneously empower and constrain state organs and officials for the purpose of protecting the rights and liberties of subjects or citizens did not exist in traditional China. But there did exist for more than two millenniums elaborate and sophisticated rules regulating the powers and functions of each component of the highly complex and extensive machinery of imperial organs and officials, and prescribing in detail the duties of officials as well as the multiple and complicated monitoring, supervisory and disciplinary mechanisms applicable to the exercise of powers and performance of duties by officials in different state organs. By the late 19th century, Qing China’s increasing subordination to Western imperialism and semi-colonialism convinced significant numbers of Chinese political and scholarly elite that there was a desperate need for China to “save” and strengthen itself by pursuing modernization. In the legal and political domains, this generally meant extensive borrowing or transplant of Western political and legal institutions. After China's defeat by Japan in the Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895, Japan’s experience of successful modernisation was widely admired by Chinese intellectuals, and the Japanese model was perceived as one that China should imitate in its self-strengthening efforts. This essay will therefore begin with the introduction and reception of Japanese administrative law in China in the late Qing Dynasty. It will then survey the study of comparative law and the influence of foreign law on the development of Chinese administrative law in the Republic of China era (1911–1949) and after the establishment of the People's Republic of China (1949-). Major developments in Chinese administrative law in both the Republican era and the Communist era will also be briefly outlined as the context of administrative law scholarship. It will be seen that the story of the study of comparative and foreign administrative law in modern China is very closely intertwined with the story of the development of Chinese administrative law itself.

Civil Law in Qing and Republican China

DISCOVERING THE CHINESE COMMON LAW: THE FORMATION OF THE LOAN CONTRACT IN THE QING DYNASTY

The Last Hundred Years of China's Civil Law

The reform of the legal system in the late Qing

Civil Law Research Review

Reformation, Inheritance and the Evolvement of Law: A Cultural Analysis of Confucianization of the Ancient Chinese Laws

The Chinese Tradition of Administrative Law

The Magnificent Turn-round and Development of Civil Law in China——The Retrospect and Prospect of Civil Law in a Century in China

Analyzing Japan Searches to the Chinese Law Modernize Influence

The Historical Review of Attitudes towards China's Law in Japan

Revision of the Civil Procedure Code of the Grand Qing Empire

The Roman Law Tradition and Its Future Development in China

The History of Chinese Legal Civilization

Breaking Through the Boundaries of Qing Legal History:Comment on Recent International Scholarship on Traditional Chinese Law(1644-1911)

New Study on Criminal Law of Qing Dynasty Approved by Emperor

From The General Provisions Of Civil Law To The General Rules Of Civil Law: A Historic Leap

Did the Confucianization of Law not Happen?——Take Kinship Legal Institutions as Center

Chinese Legal Culture: From Tradition to Modernity

Bandits, Collaborators, and Wives and Concubines

Progressing with the Reform and Opening Up: Retrospective of China’s Civil Law (1978–2008)

China'S Civil Law Since Reform And Opening Up In 1978