Capitalism Without Democracy: the Private Sector in Contemporary China. by Kellee S. Tsai. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2007. Xiv, 228 Pp. $55.00 (cloth); $21.00 (Paper).

Jean‐Marc F. Blanchard

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021911808002027

2008-01-01

Abstract:The explosion of China's private sector has fueled expectations that China would embark on the path to democracy. To date, these expectations have remained unfulfilled, to the dismay of some, as well as to the glee of others who contend that the potential for economics to bring meaningful political change to China have been seriously exaggerated.Kellee S. Tsai pinpoints in her study why those envisioning a transformative role for China's private sector have been so wrong. First, they have taken it for granted that the private sector is monolithic, when, in actuality, there are big differences among entrepreneurs in terms of background, policy concerns, and attitudes toward democracy. Second, they have assumed that all private business owners will favor “democratic” advocacy mechanisms, when, in reality, there is considerable variation in their preferences. Third, they have neglected the potential for the Chinese regime to adapt to the needs of the private sector.The issue of adaptation is fundamental to Tsai's conceptual work. Highlighting that “major institutional changes relating to the private sector have occurred since the late 1970s” (p. 8), Tsai embarks on the task of explaining how these changes could have occurred in China in the absence of pressure from business. Moreover, she queries “how can regime durability be explained in light of significant political and institutional changes since the late 1970s” (pp. 14–15). The key explanatory factor for Tsai is “adaptive informal institutions” (AIIs) or informal coping mechanisms that private entrepreneurs use to deal with the shortcomings of formal institutions. According to Tsai, if repeated and tolerated, these AIIs may over time modify or transform formal institutions in a manner better tailored to realities on the ground.The volume is divided into seven chapters addressing the aforementioned issues: Chapters 1 and 2 frame the debate and review a number of approaches on capitalist-led democratization, regime durability, and institutional change. Chapter 2 formalizes Tsai's ideas about AIIs, the circumstances that give rise to such practices, and the causal paths through which AIIs may influence formal institutions. Chapter 3 functions as the case study of the book by illustrating the relational dynamic of the AII model developed in chapter 2. Chapter 4 presents a treasure trove of information on the backgrounds, policy concerns, and trust levels of China's private businesspeople, coupled with data on their views about the role of government and their conceptualization of democracy. Chapter 5 deals with the diverse tactics that China's private entrepreneurs exploit to handle the business and policy challenges that they face. Chapter 6 details local variation in the views of entrepreneurs as well as their coping strategies. Chapter 7 concludes the book.Tsai's study raises several theoretical and methodological questions. On theoretical issues, it might have been more appropriate to evaluate similarities and differences among “key” capitalists rather than all capitalists. After all, some suggest that revolution is made by the few, not the many. Furthermore, the book could have adopted a richer definition of international factors other than just international crises. Given the timing of the events that Tsai highlights, it is plausible, for example, that the global capitalist system legitimated or supported top-down institutional change in favor of private entrepreneurs in China as well as procapitalist AIIs within China. Another concern is that Tsai's AII model seems to focus solely on the ability of AIIs to affect cost–benefit calculations without treating the issue of AIIs in shaping preferences.In terms of methodological issues, it would have been helpful if Tsai had engaged in more substantial process tracing to validate her claims about endogenous institutional change through AIIs. She could also have developed some scheme to measure the coherence and strength of informal and formal institutions. In the absence of such, it is difficult to make comparisons, to judge AIIs that emerged, and to evaluate the degree of change that AIIs drove in formal institutions or vice versa. Finally, it would have been useful to include some justification for the institutions that were selected for analysis.Regardless, this is a richly researched, thoughtful, and timely study. The level of data in the book on private entrepreneurs in China, built upon Tsai's national survey in 2002 (Back-Alley Banking: Private Entrepreneurs in China [Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2002]), as well as hundreds of interviews that she conducted, is truly phenomenal. Furthermore, her AII model attunes us to the importance of understanding other sources of institutional change, helps clarify the dynamics of institutional change, and demonstrates how significant institutional change can occur without substantial regime change. This book is highly recommended for those studying the prospects for China to democratize and democratization more generally, those interested in the linkage between political and economic factors, and those with interests in modernization, globalization, and political transitions, as well as for graduate courses relating to the aforementioned topics.