Absorption of Atmospheric NO2 by Spruce (picea Abies L. Karst.) Trees

Barbara Thoene,Peter Schröder,H. Papen,A. Egger,Heinz Rennenberg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1991.tb00962.x
IF: 9.4
1991-01-01
New Phytologist
Abstract:summary When spruce ( Picea abies L., Karst.) branches were exposed to 5.2–18.7 nl NO 2 l −1 the flux to the shoots increased linearly with increasing NO 2 concentrations. At NO 2 concentrations below 2.6 nl l −1 uptake of NO 2 by the shoots was not observed. The measured flux of NO 2 to the shoots was found to be lower than the NO 2 flux predicted from the shoot conductance to diffusion of H 2 O. These results are consistent with the existence of internal resistances for NO 2 influx, e.g. production and emission of NO 2 by the leaves. However, emission of NO 2 was not observed. When the NO 2 flux to the shoots was plotted versus transpiration rate, a linear increase was found with an y‐axis intercept. The intercept may be interpreted as the NO 2 flux to the cuticle and the bark; its value increased with increasing atmospheric NO 2 concentrations. The flux of NO 2 to the shoots showed diurnal variation with high levels in the light and low levels during darkness. NO 2 flux to the branches was dependent on light intensity. This dependency can largely be explained by light dependent changes in shoot conductance. Daytime light intensity determined also the night‐time shoot conductance and, hence, the NO 2 flux to the branches during the night. The ratio of NO 2 flux to transpiration rate was higher in the dark than in the light. Whether this observation can be explained by a light dependency of internal resistances remains to be elucidated. The absorption of NO 2 by the shoots enhanced the in vitro NR activity of the needles, while NiR and GS activities were not increased significantly. One day after exposure to NO 2 concentrations of 60 nl l −1 , nitrate reductase (NR) activity was three times higher than that of untreated controls. However, after three days of NO 2 exposure the NR activity declined to the level of untreated controls. Apparently, the increased in vitro NR activity upon NO 2 fumigation is a transient phenomenon in spruce needles. The regulatory events that may modulate NR activity of the needles, when exposed to atmospheric NO 2 , are discussed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?