Abstract:We apply two approximate solutions of the quantum-classical Liouville equation (QCLE) in the mapping representation to the simulation of the laser-induced response of a quantum subsystem coupled to a classical environment. These solutions, known as the Poisson Bracket Mapping Equation (PBME) and the Forward-Backward (FB) trajectory solutions, involve simple algorithms in which the dynamics of both the quantum and classical degrees of freedom are described in terms of continuous variables, as opposed to standard surface-hopping solutions in which the classical degrees of freedom hop between potential energy surfaces dictated by the discrete adiabatic state of the quantum subsystem. The validity of these QCLE-based solutions is tested on a non-trivial electron transfer model involving more than two quantum states, a time-dependent Hamiltonian, strong subsystem-bath coupling, and an initial energy shift between the donor and acceptor states that depends on the strength of the subsystem-bath coupling. In particular, we calculate the time-dependent population of the photoexcited donor state in response to an ultrafast, on-resonance pump pulse in a three-state model of an electron transfer complex that is coupled asymmetrically to a bath of harmonic oscillators through the optically dark acceptor state. Within this approach, the three-state electron transfer complex is treated quantum mechanically, while the bath oscillators are treated classically. When compared to the more accurate QCLE-based surface-hopping solution and to the numerically exact quantum results, we find that the PBME solution is not capable of qualitatively capturing the population dynamics, whereas the FB solution is. However, when the subsystem-bath coupling is decreased (which also decreases the initial energy shift between the donor and acceptor states) or the initial shift is removed altogether, both the PBME and FB results agree better with the QCLE-based surface-hopping results. These findings highlight the challenges posed by various conditions such as a time-dependent external field, the strength of the subsystem-bath coupling, and the degree of asymmetry on the accuracy of the PBME and FB algorithms. (C) 2013 American Institute of Physics. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4799272]

Optical Control of Molecular Dynamics: Liouville-space Theory

Optical Control of Molecular-Dynamics - Molecular Cannons, Reflectrons, and Wave-Packet Focusers

Chapter 11. Optimal Control of Molecular Dynamics by Light

Optimal-Control Of Molecular-Dynamics Via 2-Photon Process

Controlling Directed Atomic Motion and Second-Order Tunneling of a Spin-Orbit-coupled Atom in Optical Lattices

Effective Langevin Equation Approach to the Molecular Diffusion on Optical Lattices

Optimal control of molecular dynamics via two-photon processes

Optically Induced Molecular Logic Operations

A Mixed Quantum-Classical Liouville Study Of The Population Dynamics In A Model Photo-Induced Condensed Phase Electron Transfer Reaction

Optical Control of Non-Equilibrium Phonon Dynamics.

Many-body Dynamics of Dipolar Molecules in an Optical Lattice.

Laser control of molecular rotation: Expanding the utility of an optical centrifuge

Single-molecule motion control

Topology of Classical Molecular Optimal Control Landscapes in Phase Space

Manipulating Optical Nonlinearities of Molecular Polaritons by Delocalization

Onsager Reaction Field Description of Optical Properties of Octupolar Molecules in Solution

Optimal Control of Multisurface Molecular Systems

Quantum Control of Molecular Dynamics: the Strong Response Regime

Optimal Control of Quantum Non-Markovian Dissipation: Reduced Liouville-space Theory

Detection and Control of Molecular Quantum Dynamics

Shining a Light on the Molecular and Nanoscopic Worlds