Abstract 5235: Combination STING agonist and NK cellular therapy in patient derived organotypic tumor spheroids
Patrick H. Lizotte,Elena Ivanova,Sung Park,Nathaniel Spicer,Sophie Kivlehan,Iliana Gjeci,Stefan Kiesgen,Vicky Appleman,LeeAnn Talarico,Michael Y. Tolstorukov,Raphael Bueno,David A. Barbie,Cloud P. Paweletz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2024-5235
IF: 11.2
2024-03-22
Cancer Research
Abstract:Abstract Background: Increasing the immunogenicity of solid tumors may potentiate durable anti-tumor immunity. Targeting innate pattern recognition receptor signaling is a promising strategy to repolarizing the suppressive tumor immune microenvironment (TME). A potential synergistic approach is the addition of cellular therapy. Tumor models expressing high levels of endogenous STING, but where the pathway is not active, were considered for evaluating STING agonism as a potential intervention. Additionally, prior work has demonstrated that STING induction is toxic to T cells; however, natural killer (NK) cells are unaffected, due to their differential regulation of autophagy. Here we investigate the immunomodulatory properties of STING agonism alone and in combination with NK cells using short-term microfluidic culture of fresh patient-derived organotypic tumor spheroids (PDOTS). Methods: Surgical cases from Brigham and Women’s Hospital under an IRB-approved protocol were studied. PDOTS were generated as previously described. Ex vivo response was assessed by fluorescent live/dead imaging, immunofluorescence (IF), multiplexed cytokine array, and single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq). Baseline immune phenotypes were analyzed by FACS from single cells isolated during tumor sample preparation. Results: Twelve explants were studied. Two specimens were excluded from viability assessment due to excess of fibrotic material and low viability. Using a cut-off of -40%, three cases were characterized as responders (R) and seven as non-responders (NR). We observed significant induction of CXCL10 in all samples treated with STING agonist. IFN-β, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and MIP1-α were also consistently induced by STING agonist treatment. More detailed analysis of two samples by scRNAseq revealed a strong interferon stimulated genes (ISG) signature in STING agonist conditions; the cellular source of CXCL10 secretion in STING agonist treatment was tumor cells and fibroblasts. We also observed profound changes in myeloid biology, indicating that these cells polarized to a more pro-inflammatory and antigen-presenting phenotype with STING agonism. Interestingly, NK-based cell therapy added to PDOTS cultures displayed better persistence and enhanced effector function relative to endogenous NK cells, with and without STING agonism. Conclusions: Using tumor explants and a variety of orthogonal techniques, we investigated the response to STING agonism and NK cellular therapy ex vivo. Our results indicate that STING agonism remodels the TME, creating a more immune-permissive environment. STING agonism induces secretion of chemoattractant CXCL10 by tumor cells and fibroblasts. STING agonism does not abrogate NK cell effector function and therefore, may synergize with NK cell therapies. Citation Format: Patrick H. Lizotte, Elena Ivanova, Sung Park, Nathaniel Spicer, Sophie Kivlehan, Iliana Gjeci, Stefan Kiesgen, Vicky Appleman, LeeAnn Talarico, Michael Y. Tolstorukov, Raphael Bueno, David A. Barbie, Cloud P. Paweletz. Combination STING agonist and NK cellular therapy in patient derived organotypic tumor spheroids [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5235.
oncology