Abstract:Cost versus accuracy trade-offs are frequently encountered in materials science and engineering, where a particular property of interest can be measured/computed at different levels of accuracy or fidelity. Naturally, the most accurate measurement is also the most resource and time intensive, while the inexpensive quicker alternatives tend to be noisy. In such situations, a number of machine learning (ML) based multifidelity information fusion (MFIF) strategies can be employed to fuse information accessible from varying sources of fidelity and make predictions at the highest level of accuracy. In this work, we perform a comparative study on traditionally employed single-fidelity and three MFIF strategies, namely, (1) Δ-learning, (2) low-fidelity as a feature, and (3) multifidelity cokriging (CK) to compare their relative prediction accuracies and efficiencies for accelerated property predictions and high throughput chemical space explorations. We perform our analysis using a dopant formation energy data set for hafnia, which is a well-known high-<i>k</i> material and is being extensively studied for its promising ferroelectric, piezoelectric, and pyroelectric properties. We use a dopant formation energy data set of 42 dopants in hafnia—each studied in six different hafnia phases—computed at two levels of fidelities to find merits and limitations of these ML strategies. The findings of this work indicate that the MFIF based learning schemes outperform the traditional SF machine learning methods, such as Gaussian process regression and CK provides an accurate, inexpensive and flexible alternative to other MFIF strategies. While the results presented here are for the case study of hafnia, they are expected to be general. Therefore, materials discovery problems that involve huge chemical space explorations can be studied efficiently (or even made feasible in some situations) through a combination of a large number of low-fidelity and a few high-fidelity measurements/computations, in conjunction with the CK approach.

Exploring Multi-Fidelity Data in Materials Science: Challenges, Applications, and Optimized Learning Strategies

Practical multi-fidelity machine learning: fusion of deterministic and Bayesian models

Deep Multi-Fidelity Active Learning of High-dimensional Outputs

Multi-Fidelity Physics-Constrained Neural Network and Its Application in Materials Modeling

Learning properties of ordered and disordered materials from multi-fidelity data

Multi-Fidelity Methods for Optimization: A Survey

Multi-Task Multi-Fidelity Learning of Properties for Energetic Materials

Multi-fidelity Machine Learning for Uncertainty Quantification and Optimization

Role of Multifidelity Data in Sequential Active Learning Materials Discovery Campaigns: Case Study of Electronic Bandgap

Multifidelity linear regression for scientific machine learning from scarce data

Multifidelity Information Fusion with Machine Learning: A Case Study of Dopant Formation Energies in Hafnia

A multi-fidelity transfer learning strategy based on multi-channel fusion

A Multi-Output Multi-Fidelity Gaussian Process Model for Non-Hierarchical Low-Fidelity Data Fusion

Materials Data toward Machine Learning: Advances and Challenges

A strategy to apply machine learning to small datasets in materials science

Hierarchical regression framework for multi-fidelity modeling

Recent progress on machine learning with limited materials data: Using tools from data science and domain knowledge

Federated Data Quality Assessment Approach: Robust Learning With Mixed Label Noise

Active Learning-Assisted Multi-Fidelity Surrogate Modeling Based on Geometric Transformation

Machine Learning in Materials Design: Algorithm and Application*

Multi-type Data Fusion Via Transfer Learning Surrogate Modeling and Its Engineering Application