Abstract:Why do some employees respond well to negative feedback, whereas others respond poorly? We suggest it depends on two factors: first, employees’ attribution of the feedback, or why employees believe their supervisor provides negative feedback in the first place, and second, employees’ core self-evaluation (CSE). These factors have implications for employees’ motivation to learn and learning performance. We tested our hypotheses using two three-wave time-lagged survey data from 370 employees in the United States (Study 1) and 302 hospital nurses in China (Study 2). Results suggest that for employees with high CSE, negative feedback is positively associated with the attribution that the feedback is given for performance-driven purposes (i.e. external attribution), which is in turn positively related to their motivation to learn. For employees with low CSE, negative feedback is positively related to the attribution that the feedback is given for self-serving purposes (i.e. internal attribution). Such attribution is negatively related to motivation to learn (Study 1), which further predicts the increase in their learning performance (Study 2). This study not only extends the theoretical understanding of negative feedback effectiveness, but also offers implications for supervisors to better deliver and for employees to better receive negative feedback.

Does Negative Performance Feedback Always Lead to Negative Responses? the Role of Trust in the Leader

Leader-member Exchange and Member Performance: A New Look at Individual-Level Negative Feedback-Seeking Behavior and Team-Level Empowerment Climate.

Effects of Perceptions on LMX and Work Performance: Effects of Supervisors’ Perception of Subordinates’ Emotional Intelligence and Subordinates’ Perception of Trust in the Supervisor on LMX And, Consequently, Performance

Leadership Justice and Negative Organizational Behaviors: Mediated by Affective Commitment

When and Why Leader Negative Feedback Facilitates Employee Proactive Behavior:The Critical Role of Leader-Member Exchange

Reporting Only the Good News but Not the Bad? Mechanism of Negative Performance Feedback

Effects of Supervisor Negative Feedback on Employees’ Feedback Management Behaviours

Why and when is Frequent Supervisory Negative Feedback Undesirable? the Role of Trust in Supervisor and Attribution of Supervisor Motives

NEGATIVE FEEDBACK AND EMPLOYEE JOB PERFORMANCE: MODERATING ROLE OF THE BIG FIVE

Revisiting the mediating role of trust in transformational leadership effects: Do different types of trust make a difference?

How Does Supervisor Negative Feedback Influence Employee Learning? an Attribution Perspective

The Impact of Participative Leadership on Job Performance and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Distinguishing Between the Mediating Effects of Affective and Cognitive Trust

Unethical Leader Behavior and Employee Performance: a Deontic Justice Perspective

Leader Phubbing and Employee Job Performance: the Effect of Need for Social Approval

Supervisor Negative Feedback and Employee Motivation to Learn: an Attribution Perspective

Why Do I Seek Negative Feedback? Assessment Orientation, Self-Criticism, and Negative Feedback-Seeking

Opening a Performance Dialogue With Employees

How Leader Negative Emotional Expression Influences Follower Performance? the Mediating Role of Work Engagement and the Moderating Role of Internal Locus of Control

Relationship between Double-channel Negative Feedback-seeking and Employees' Job Performance:Considering Moderating Effect of Role Clarity

The Short-Term Effects of Supervisor Negative Feedback on Employee Well-Being and Performance

Performance feedback and enterprise digital transformation