Evaluating the use of blood pressure polygenic risk scores across race/ethnic background groups
Nuzulul Kurniansyah,Matthew O. Goodman,Alyna T. Khan,Jiongming Wang,Elena Feofanova,Joshua C. Bis,Kerri L. Wiggins,Jennifer E. Huffman,Tanika Kelly,Tali Elfassy,Xiuqing Guo,Walter Palmas,Henry J. Lin,Shih-Jen Hwang,Yan Gao,Kendra Young,Gregory L. Kinney,Jennifer A. Smith,Bing Yu,Simin Liu,Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller,JoAnn E. Manson,Xiaofeng Zhu,Yii-Der Ida Chen,I-Te Lee,C. Charles Gu,Donald M. Lloyd-Jones,Sebastian Zöllner,Myriam Fornage,Charles Kooperberg,Adolfo Correa,Bruce M. Psaty,Donna K. Arnett,Carmen R. Isasi,Stephen S. Rich,Robert C. Kaplan,Susan Redline,Braxton D. Mitchell,Nora Franceschini,Daniel Levy,Jerome I. Rotter,Alanna C. Morrison,Tamar Sofer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38990-9
IF: 16.6
2023-06-02
Nature Communications
Abstract:Abstract We assess performance and limitations of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for multiple blood pressure (BP) phenotypes in diverse population groups. We compare “clumping-and-thresholding” (PRSice2) and LD-based (LDPred2) methods to construct PRSs from each of multiple GWAS, as well as multi-PRS approaches that sum PRSs with and without weights, including PRS-CSx. We use datasets from the MGB Biobank, TOPMed study, UK biobank, and from All of Us to train, assess, and validate PRSs in groups defined by self-reported race/ethnic background (Asian, Black, Hispanic/Latino, and White). For both SBP and DBP, the PRS-CSx based PRS, constructed as a weighted sum of PRSs developed from multiple independent GWAS, perform best across all race/ethnic backgrounds. Stratified analysis in All of Us shows that PRSs are better predictive of BP in females compared to males, individuals without obesity, and middle-aged (40-60 years) compared to older and younger individuals.
multidisciplinary sciences