Ten-year Follow-Up of Very-High Risk Hypertensive Patients Undergoing Renal Sympathetic Denervation.

Li Wang,Chao Li,Zhuqing Li,Qi Li,Chunlei Liu,Xiaoqiang Sun,Qiang He,Da-sheng Xia,Dachuan Xia,Chengzhi Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0000000000003650
IF: 4.9
2024-01-01
Journal of Hypertension
Abstract:Objectives: Renal denervation (RDN) has been proven to be effective in lowering blood pressure (BP) in patients, but previous studies have had short follow-ups and have not examined the effects of RDN on major cardiovascular outcomes. This study aimed to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of RDN in the long-term treatment of hypertension and to determine if it has an effect on cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: All patients with resistant hypertension who underwent RDN between 2011 and 2015 at Tianjin First Central Hospital were included in the study. Patients were followed up at 1,5 and 10 years and the longest follow-up was 12 years. Data were collected on office BP, home BP, ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), renal function, antihypertensive drug regimen, major adverse events (including acute myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular death and all cause death) and safety events. Results: A total of 60 participants with mean age 50.37 ± 15.19 years (43.33% female individuals) completed long-term follow-up investigations with a mean of 10.02 ± 1.72 years post-RDN. Baseline office SBP and DBP were 179.08 ± 22.05 and 101.17 ± 16.57 mmHg under a mean number of 4.22 ± 1.09 defined daily doses (DDD), with a reduction of −35.93/−14.76 mmHg as compared with baseline estimates ( P < 0.0001). Compared with baseline, ambulatory SBP and DBP after 10-years follow-up were reduced by 14.31 ± 10.18 ( P < 0.001) and 9 ± 4.35 ( P < 0.001) mmHg, respectively. In comparison to baseline, participants were taking fewer antihypertensive medications ( P < 0.001), and their mean heart rate had decreased ( P < 0.001). Changes in renal function, as assessed by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and creatinine, were within the expected rate of age-related decline. No major adverse events related to the RDN procedure were observed in long-term consequences. All-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality rates were 10 and 8.34%, respectively, for the 10-year period. Conclusion: The BP-lowering effect of RDN was safely sustained for at least 10 years post-procedure. More importantly, to the best of my knowledge, this is the first study to explore cardiovascular and all-cause mortality at 10 years after RDN.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?