Abstract:Abstract. How global gridded crop models (GGCMs) differ in their simulation of potential yield and reasons for those differences have never been assessed. The GGCM Intercomparison (GGCMI) offers a good framework for this assessment. Here, we built an emulator (called SMM for simple mechanistic model) of GGCMs based on generic and simplified formalism. The SMM equations describe crop phenology by a sum of growing degree days, canopy radiation absorption by the Beer–Lambert law, and its conversion into aboveground biomass by a radiation use efficiency (RUE). We fitted the parameters of this emulator against gridded aboveground maize biomass at the end of the growing season simulated by eight different GGCMs in a given year (2000). Our assumption is that the simple set of equations of SMM, after calibration, could reproduce the response of most GGCMs so that differences between GGCMs can be attributed to the parameters related to processes captured by the emulator. Despite huge differences between GGCMs, we show that if we fit both a parameter describing the thermal requirement for leaf emergence by adjusting its value to each grid-point in space, as done by GGCM modellers following the GGCMI protocol, and a GGCM-dependent globally uniform RUE, then the simple set of equations of the SMM emulator is sufficient to reproduce the spatial distribution of the original aboveground biomass simulated by most GGCMs. The grain filling is simulated in SMM by considering a fixed-in-time fraction of net primary productivity allocated to the grains (frac) once a threshold in leaves number (nthresh) is reached. Once calibrated, these two parameters allow for the capture of the relationship between potential yield and final aboveground biomass of each GGCM. It is particularly important as the divergence among GGCMs is larger for yield than for aboveground biomass. Thus, we showed that the divergence between GGCMs can be summarized by the differences in a few parameters. Our simple but mechanistic model could also be an interesting tool to test new developments in order to improve the simulation of potential yield at the global scale.

Bayes Linear Emulation of Simulated Crop Yield

A Bayesian hierarchical framework for emulating a complex crop yield simulator

Potential Yield Simulated by Global Gridded Crop Models: Using a Process-Based Emulator to Explain Their Differences

Exploratory Data Analysis on Blueberry yield through Bayes and Function Models

Emulation of Multivariate Simulators Using Thin-Plate Splines with Application to Atmospheric Dispersion

Opportunistic Emulation of Computationally Expensive Simulations via Deep Learning

A Fast and Calibrated Computer Model Emulator: An Empirical Bayes Approach

Efficient Emulation of Computer Models Utilising Multiple Known Boundaries of Differing Dimensions

FaIRGP: A Bayesian Energy Balance Model for Surface Temperatures Emulation

Finding the Perfect Fit: Applying Regression Models to ClimateBench v1.0

Embed and Emulate: Contrastive representations for simulation-based inference

A Comprehensive Modeling Approach for Crop Yield Forecasts using AI-based Methods and Crop Simulation Models

Integrating APSIM model with machine learning to predict wheat yield spatial distribution

Modelling crop yield and harvest index: the role of carbon assimilation and allocation parameters

Assimilation of Wheat and Soil States into the APSIM-Wheat Crop Model: A Case Study

Modelling sugarcane production systems I. Development and performance of the sugarcane module

A novel mechanism to simulate intercropping and relay cropping using the DayCent model

A Multiple Crop Model Ensemble for Improving Broad-Scale Yield Prediction Using Bayesian Model Averaging

Simulating crop yield using the DSSAT v4.7-CROPGRO-soyabean model with gridded weather and soil data

Assimilation of Remote Sensing Data into Crop Growth Model for Yield Estimation: A Case Study from India

Meta-knowledge guided Bayesian optimization framework for robust crop yield estimation