Pollution characteristics and health risks of groundwater from heavy metals in Northwest Salt Lake Basin

YAN Yan,GAO Ruizhong,LIU Tingxi,FANG Lijing,WANG Yinlong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2022060806
IF: 4.236
2023-01-01
Environmental Chemistry
Abstract:Exploring the distribution characteristics of heavy metal in groundwater and its potential risks to human health were conducive to utilize and protect the groundwater and salinization resources effectively. In this paper, taking the heavy metal risk area of Jilantai Salt Lake Basin in Inner Mongolia as the study area, the physicochemical indicators such as pH, TDS, eight major ions, Cr6+, Cu, Zn, As, Cd, and Pb in the groundwater samples were tested and analyzed. The spatial distribution characteristics of heavy metals were revealed and its control factors were analyzed; the risk level of heavy metal pollution were evaluated; the degree of health risk and the homology of ions were judged. The results showed that the rank of heavy metals concentration in groundwater were Cr6+>Zn>Cu>As>Pb>Cd, and Cr6+and As in local areas exceeded the class III limits of the groundwater quality standard (GB/T 14848—2017); the distribution of heavy metals existed significant spatial differences, and the high-value areas mainly located in the northwest and the southwest of the basin; totally, the groundwater were safe and clean, and only slight pollution in the southeast part were founded; Cr6+, Cr and Cu have certain homology, Zn, Cd and Pb have similar sources or similar migration and transformation processes; the distribution of heavy metals were mainly influenced by natural factors such as geotechnical minerals, meteorological and hydrological factors, and the ionic components migrated and evolved under the control of similar environmental geochemistry; the health risks from the chemical carcinogenic heavy metals through drinking water were higher than non-carcinogens, and the health risks to children's from heavy metals were higher than adults; the health risk value of Cr6+ were 6.2×10−5 a−1, which was lower than the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(US EPA), but exceeded the maximum acceptable risk level recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP); the rank of health risk from non-carcinogenic heavy metals was Cu>Pb>Zn, and their concentrations were far lower the maximum acceptable levels recommended by ICRP.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?