Impact of Preoperative [18F]FDG PET/CT Vs. Contrast-Enhanced CT in the Staging and Survival of Patients with Clinical Stage I and II Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: a 10-Year Follow-Up Study.

Jun-Tao Lin,Xiang-Meng Li,Wen-Zhao Zhong,Qing-Yi Hou,Chun-Ling Liu,Xin-Yue Yu,Kai-Yan Ye,Yi-Lu Cheng,Jia-Yu Du,Yun-Qing Sun,Fu-Gui Zhang,Hong-Hong Yan,Ri-Qiang Liao,Song Dong,Ben-Yuan Jiang,Si-Yang Liu,Yi-Long Wu,Xue-Ning Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-023-01888-z
2024-01-01
Annals of Nuclear Medicine
Abstract:To elucidate the impact of [18F]FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) vs. CT workup on staging and prognostic evaluation of clinical stage (c) I-II NSCLC. We retrospectively identified 659 cI-II NSCLC who underwent CT (267 patients) or preoperative CT followed by PET/CT (392 patients), followed by curative-intended complete resection in our hospital from January 2008 to December 2013. Differences were assessed between preoperative and postoperative stage. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier approach and compared with log-rank test. Impact of preoperative PET/CT on survival was assessed by Cox regression analysis. The study included 659 patients [mean age, 59.5 years ± 10.8 (standard deviation); 379 men]. The PET/CT group was superior over CT group in DFS [12.6 vs. 6.9 years, HR 0.67 (95
What problem does this paper attempt to address?