Abstract:When Joseph Priestley discovered oxygen in 1774, he found that air was a mixture of gases. He called one of these gases “dephlogisticated air,” to which later the chemist Antoine Lavoisier gave the name “oxygen” which made candles burn brighter and longer than ordinary air [1]. Until now, this discovery covers 2 essential features of oxygen which in clinical practice results in the use of oxygen as a drug. In clinical practice, oxygen can be life-saving by giving to patients with tissue hypoxemia. However, too much oxygenation can cause toxicity, which has been well described in the literature. Oxygen toxicity in central nervous system is termed Paul Bert effect and in the lung it is termed Lorrain Smith effect. The Paul Bert effect results in seizures from which the onset depends upon the partial pressure of oxygen in the breathing gas and exposure duration. This effect is well known among divers and in hyperbaric facilities. Respiratory side effects from oxygen are more frequently observed in critical care settings resulting in a restrictive policy not to administer more oxygen than required. In this context, however, it is important to have the formulae of oxygen content in mind while not just relying on the oxygen saturation values (arterial oxygen content = (Hb × 1.34 × SaO 2 ) + (0.0031 × PaO 2 )). Additionally, NICU patients are potentially at risk for Terry’s syndrome or retinopathy of prematurity, a disease of the eye when oxygen is administered for premature development of the lungs. Although oxygen is a natural molecule, the complexity of its interactions with human metabolism continues to be a subject for in-depth research [2]. In this thematic issue of oxygen therapy and ventilatory support (OTVS), several papers investigated and discussed some key aspects in the field of respiratory failure and ventilator support. J.-L. Vincent et al. published an article addressing the harmful effect of hyperoxia on critical illness. It has been reported that the effect of partial pressure of arterial oxygenation on mortality follows a quadratic function [3], and there is nadir at which the mortality rate is the lowest. Respiratory support can be performed by a variety of techniques, ranging from the simple oxygen therapy to complex extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). In patients with ECMO, the mechanical ventilation usually plays an important role. The appropriate setting of the ventilator is of vital importance to provide oxygen supply to vital organs while avoiding lung injury. It is an art and science where, in most circumstances, there is a lack of high-level evidence from randomized controlled trials. Z. Zhang and colleagues discussed some important aspects on the use of mechanical ventilation in patients with ECMO. S. Ye and his colleagues investigated the effect of antipyretic therapy on mortality outcome in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. The study employed the MIMIC-II database as the source of data [4]. The database is freely available to the public and is the gold standard of the critical care big data. It provides in-hospital clinical data with high granularity, and data mining using such database can provide insights into complex interactions between disease severity, medical treatment, and procedures. Such complex interactions may not be feasible in conventional randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Also, traditional RCTs are designed to explore the biological efficacy of a certain intervention, which may not be applicable to real world settings where the clinical effectiveness is most highlighted. There is evidence that the results obtained fromRCTs can be different from that obtained by observational studies [5].

The Protocols of Our Discontent

Investigating Why Clinicians Deviate from Standards of Care: Liberating Patients from Mechanical Ventilation in the ICU

Oxygen Therapy and Ventilatory Support

Balancing Act: Evaluating the Need for Airborne Isolation Tools—Sometimes More Is Less

Psychological Issues in the Care of Critically-Ill Respirator Patients: Differential Perceptions of Patients, Relatives, and Staff

Patterns of interactions among ICU interprofessional teams: A prospective patient-shift-level survey approach

Communication and Decision Making About Life-Sustaining Treatment: Examining the Experiences of Resident Physicians and Seriously-Ill Hospitalized Patients

The Influence of Participation in an Intensive Care Trial on Health Practitioners' Knowledge of the Results—A Self‐Reported Survey

Protocols and guidelines in critical care: development and implementation

Attitudes and Perceptions amongst Critical Care Physicians towards Handshake Antimicrobial Stewardship Rounds

What stops hospital clinical staff from following protocols? An analysis of the incidence and factors behind the failure of bedside clinical staff to activate the rapid response system in a multi-campus Australian metropolitan healthcare service

Comfort and Coordination among Interprofessional Care Providers Involved in Intubations in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Exploring Communication Needs and Challenges in the Intensive Care Unit: A Survey Study From Providers' and Patients' Perspectives

Perspectives on Sedation Among Interdisciplinary Team Members in ICU: A Survey Study

A respiratory critical care nurse training program for settings without a registered respiratory therapists: A protocol for a multimethod study

Impact of Interprofessional Teamwork on Aligning Intensive Care Unit Care with Patient Goals: A Qualitative Study of Transactive Memory Systems

Critical Care Experience Shapes Respiratory Therapists' Attitudes toward Death: A Survey Study

Underrepresentation of Respiratory Therapists as Experts in Delphi Studies on Respiratory Practices and Research Priorities

Investigating ethical tradeoffs in crisis standards of care through simulation of ventilator allocation protocols

Nurses' experience with patient deterioration and rapid response teams

Effect of Intensivist Communication in a Simulated Setting on Interpretation of Prognosis Among Family Members of Patients at High Risk of Intensive Care Unit Admission: A Randomized Trial