Maxillary traction splint: a cephalometric evaluation

S F Caldwell,T A Hymas,T A Timm
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90158-1
Abstract:Orthodontists are particularly interested in knowing exactly what skeletal and dental changes are produced by headgear. With headgear and fixed appliances, part of the observed change is due to the headgear, part to the fixed appliances, and part to growth. Since the maxillary traction splint moves the teeth en masse, the dentoskeletal changes are due primarily to the headgear force. Selective mandibular dental changes can be produced by adjusting the mandibular occlusal contacts against the splint. In this study forty-seven patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusions and Class II, Division 1 malocclusions were treated with orthopedic headgear that attached to a full-coverage maxillary occlusal splint. Fifty-two patients were selected as a control for evaluation of growth changes versus treatment changes. Lateral cephalograms were taken before and after treatment, and the sagittal skeletal and dental changes were evaluated and quantified. The results of the investigation revealed (1) the establishment of a Class I posterior occlusion, (2) a significant overjet reduction, averaging 4.24 mm, (3) inhibition of vertical development of the maxilla and slight intrusion of the maxillary dentition, (4) overbite reduction by leveling of the mandibular dentition, (5) no indication that mandibular growth is accelerated, and (6) no significant increase in the mandibular plane angle. The maxillary traction splint is an effective means of correcting maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion in growing patients prior to fixed appliance therapy. The second phase of treatment with fixed appliances is necessary for individual tooth positioning and for detailing the occlusion.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?