Long-term Impact of Prophylactic Central Neck Dissection in Non-Invasive Classic Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

Zehang Xu,Zhuochao Mao,Shitu Chen,Zhe Mo,Jie Zhou,Zhendong Chen,Rasa Zarnegar,Thomas J. Fahey III,Weibin Wang,Lisong Teng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107305
2024-01-01
Abstract:Background: The utilization of prophylactic central neck dissection (pCND) in cases of non-invasive clinical nodenegative (cN0) papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) remains a topic of debate, with a dearth of long-term evidence.Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1181 cN0 PTC patients from 1997 to 2011. Of these, 641 underwent pCND (pCND + group) and 540 did not (pCND-group). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to identify similar patients. Event-free survival and long-term complications including permanent hyperparathyroidism and permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) paralysis were analyzed after PSM.Results: The pCND + group had more aggressive characteristics. In the matched cohort after PSM, the 5-year, 10year, and 15-year EFS rates were 98.9 %, 98.2 %, and 97.1 % for the pCND + group, and 97.7 %, 97.1 %, and 97.1 % for the pCND-group, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in EFS rates between the two groups (Log Rank P = 0.38). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of permanent hyperparathyroidism (3.3 % vs. 1.5 %, P = 0.08) and permanent RLN paralysis (1.7 % vs. 0.9 %, P = 0.13) between the pCND+ and pCND- groups.Conclusion: Our study, with a median follow-up duration of 107 months, indicates that pCND does not lead to a significant reduction in nodal recurrence among non-invasive cN0 PTC patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?