Identifying Newborn Discharge to Child Protective Services: Comparing Discharge Codes from Birth Hospitalization Records and Child Protection Case Files

Kathleen S. Kenny,Elizabeth Wall-Wieler,Kayla Frank,Lindey Courchene,Mary Burton,Cheryle Dreaver,Micheal Champagne,Nathan C. Nickel,Marni Brownell,Cathy Rocke,Marlyn Bennett,Marcelo L. Urquia,Marcia Anderson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2024.01.001
IF: 6.996
2024-01-06
Annals of Epidemiology
Abstract:Purpose Newborn removal by North America's child protective services (CPS) disproportionately impacts Indigenous and Black families, yet its implications for population health inequities are not well understood. To guide this as a domain for future research, we measured validity of birth hospitalization discharge codes categorizing newborns discharged to CPS. Methods Using data from 309,260 births in Manitoba, Canada, we compared data on newborns discharged to CPS from hospital discharge codes with the presumed gold standard of custody status from CPS case reports in overall population and separately by First Nations status (categorization used in Canada for Indigenous peoples who are members of a First Nation). Results Of 309,260 newborns, 4562 (1.48%) were in CPS custody at hospital discharge according to CPS case reports and 2678 (0.87%) were coded by hospitals as discharged to CPS. Sensitivity of discharge codes was low (47.8%), however codes were highly specific (99.8%) with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 81.4%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.2%. Sensitivity, PPV and specificity were equal for all newborns but NPV was lower for First Nations newborns. Conclusions Canadian hospital discharge records underestimate newborn discharge to CPS, with no difference in misclassication based on First Nations status.
public, environmental & occupational health
What problem does this paper attempt to address?